Modelling the Socio-Economic Determinants of Fertility: A Mediation Analysis using the Parametric g-formula

Abstract

Summary Theories predict that the timing of childbearing and number of children born are determined by multiple socio‐economic factors. Despite this, many methods cannot investigate the interrelationships between these determinants, including the direct and indirect influence that they have on fertility over the life course. Here we use the parametric g‐formula to examine the interdependent influences of time‐varying socio‐economic processes—education, employment status and partnership status—on fertility. To demonstrate this approach, we study a cohort of women who were born in the UK in 1970. Our results show that socio‐economic processes play an important role in determining fertility, not only directly but also indirectly. We show that increasing attendance in higher education has a largely direct effect on early childbearing up to age 25 years, resulting in a substantial increase in childlessness. However, childbearing at later ages is dominated by an indirect effect of education on fertility, via partnership status and employment status, that is twice as large as the direct effect. We also use the g‐formula to examine bias due to unobserved heterogeneity, and we demonstrate that our results appear to be robust. We conclude that the method provides a valuable tool for mediation analysis in studies of interdependent life course processes.

The risks of advancing parental age on neonatal morbidity and mortality are U- or J-shaped for both maternal and paternal ages

“…For 50 years there has been a continuous increase in the age at which men and women, living in developed countries, are having children [ 1 ]. Many are exercising a choice to delay parenthood, largely in order to complete higher levels of education but also to establish employment and family stability [ 1 , 2 ]. Educational attainment, job and financial security and father involvement all have positive health effects on the fetus and newborn [ 3 – 6 ].…”

Approaches and Methods for Causal Analysis of Panel Data in the Area of Morbidity and Mortality

“…Similar to structural equations, G-computation is a new and fl exible approach to causal analysis that is especially useful for mediation analysis. The parametric g-formula, originally developed by biostatisticians (Robins/Hernán 2009), has recently been used in demographic studies on interdependent life course processes with time-varying confounding (Bijlsma/Wilson 2020). The method fi rst runs multivariable regression models to estimate interrelationships between variables, based on the assumptions of a specifi ed Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG).…”

A generalized counterfactual approach to decomposing differences between populations

“…Our solution to these two major issues is to use parametric modeling and Monte Carlo based estimation to first parameterize all the expectations, then simulate entire populations under the observed and counterfactual scenarios using the parametric model estimates, and lastly estimate the unconditional expectations by directly taking averages from the simulated data (Bijlsma and Wilson 2019;Robert and Casella 2013). This approach of parameterizing a high-dimensional direct standardization equation is generally referred to as the parametric g-formula and using Monte Carlo estimation and simulations is a frequently applied computational procedure for parametric g-formula estimation (Bijlsma and Wilson 2019;Hernan and Robins 2019;Imai, Keele, and Tingley 2010;Keil et al 2014;Wang and Arah 2015).…”