2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the soil resistance on seabed pipelines during large cycles of lateral movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a large number of field experiments and laboratory tests, a series of pipe-seabed lateral interaction models have been developed by Wagner et al (1989), Verley and Lund (1995), Bruton et al (2006), White and Cheuk (2008) to predict the seabed resistance to lateral pipeline movements. These empirical models, considering the effects of soil strength, loading history and pipe embedment on the lateral seabed resistance, are far more complicated than simple coulomb friction model, and are comparatively applicable to large lateral movements of the pipeline.…”
Section: Pipe-seabed Lateral Interaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on a large number of field experiments and laboratory tests, a series of pipe-seabed lateral interaction models have been developed by Wagner et al (1989), Verley and Lund (1995), Bruton et al (2006), White and Cheuk (2008) to predict the seabed resistance to lateral pipeline movements. These empirical models, considering the effects of soil strength, loading history and pipe embedment on the lateral seabed resistance, are far more complicated than simple coulomb friction model, and are comparatively applicable to large lateral movements of the pipeline.…”
Section: Pipe-seabed Lateral Interaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For normally soft clay in areas of deepwater, the friction coefficient lies in the range 0.2-0.8, whilst the displacement to mobilise the resistance, y breakout , is typically 0.1 pipe diameters, therefore, the lateral shear stiffness of the seabed, k s , can be roughly estimated (White and Cheuk 2008). The values of soil model parameters are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Soil Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White and Cheuk (2008) studied the soil-pipe interaction over soft cohesive soil 1097 (kaolin clay), where the lateral motion was about 10-20 times the pipe diameter, to allow the pipe freely to 1098 buckle laterally in a controlled manner caused by thermal expansion. In this case, self-burial is unwanted, 1099 and a detailed description is given of the berm development around the pipe, when the pipe is moving back 1100 and forth and ploughing the bed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended values of the Coulomb friction coefficient, μ, lie in the range 0.2-0.8, while the displacement to mobilise this resistance is typically 0.1 pipe diameters (Lyons 1973;Wagner et al 1987;Brennodden et al 1989;White and Cheuk 2008 The conventional lateral riser-soil design procedure is to model the interaction with spring links at intervals along the riser flow-line. These links provide a bilinear soil resistance relationship in the lateral direction, as shown in Figure 3 (Elosta et al 2013).…”
Section: Randolph and Quigginmentioning
confidence: 99%