2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13821.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling ultrafine structure in dark matter haloes

Abstract: Various laboratory‐based experiments are underway attempting to detect dark matter directly. The event rates and detailed signals expected in these experiments depend on the dark matter phase‐space distribution on submilliparsec scales. These scales are many orders of magnitude smaller than those that can be resolved by conventional N‐body simulations, so one cannot hope to use such tools to investigate the effect of mergers in the history of the Milky Way on the detailed phase‐space structure probed by the cu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…composed of a small number of streams) to those on the scales resolved by simulations. The ultra-local velocity distribution may, however, contain some fine-grained substructure [71,72].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…composed of a small number of streams) to those on the scales resolved by simulations. The ultra-local velocity distribution may, however, contain some fine-grained substructure [71,72].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular cosmological N-body simulations find that DM halos have density profiles falling more rapidly at large radii, as r −3 , and velocity distributions showing significant departures from the Maxwell-Boltzmann shape, see, e.g., the results from the high-resolution simulations Via Lactea [10] and Aquarius [11]. A few analyses have discussed the impact on direct detection results when using DM phasespace distribution function as directly read out from the numerical simulations or from other specialized approaches devised to describe in detail the fine-grained structure of the DM velocity distribution, see, e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The main shortcoming of these approaches is that, since it is highly non-trivial to include baryons and baryonic feedback in the simulations, these analyses treat the Galaxy as if made of DM only (in some cases, normalizing the circular velocity obtained in the model for the DM particles to the locally measured circular velocity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we present a new method of simulating the DM distribution of the Milky Way, building on the approach developed by Fantin et al (2008, hereinafter Paper I). Applied to a merger tree describing the history of a Milky Way‐like galaxy, the model attributes to each progenitor of the halo a characteristic DM distribution, using the method developed in Paper I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%