2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling VARTM process induced variations on bending performance of composite Omega beams

Abstract: Finite element simulation with cohesive contact is presented, to correlate the vacuum assisted RTM process and the bending performance of Omega beams. The model considers the process induced variations, including part thickness, resin rich pockets and voids. The bending performance prediction relies on cohesive contact to model delamination initiation and propagation. Computing efficiency is achieved by mesh scaling. The modelling approach applies to three variations of Omega beams with the different mode-mixt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CZM method has been successfully employed to model structures of different complexities, ranging from simple beams for model validation 1416 to applications on complex composite structures. 1719…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CZM method has been successfully employed to model structures of different complexities, ranging from simple beams for model validation 1416 to applications on complex composite structures. 1719…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CZM method has been successfully employed to model structures of different complexities, ranging from simple beams for model validation [14][15][16] to applications on complex composite structures. [17][18][19] The CZM is currently the mostly widely used method to model delamination in composite structures due to its widespread implementation in commercial FE solvers. However, care should also be taken when using the CZM method because of its multiple model parameters 20 and mesh dependency effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%