Modellintegrierte Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung

Mattmann, Ilyas

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-19409-3

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, in a short formal description consistent with Mattmann's approach [31], we suggest the diction for the adhesive bonding process as comprising the time-dependent (state and property) transformation T(t) of several operands starting from an (overall) initial state S i (t 0 ) prevailing at the onset of the process at the point in time t 0 . When the process is completed at time t f , a final state S f (t f ) is achieved.…”

Section: Adhesive Bonding Processesmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…In the framework of these technical processes (or process chains), the adherend and adhesive materials may be described as operands, i.e. objects with initial relevant properties that are changed by the effect of one or more factors [31]. Following a procedure presented by Mattmann [31] for describing a product lifecycle, these factors are provided by technical systems denoted as operators.…”

Section: Adhesive Bonding Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…objects with initial relevant properties that are changed by the effect of one or more factors [31]. Following a procedure presented by Mattmann [31] for describing a product lifecycle, these factors are provided by technical systems denoted as operators. Correspondingly, at the end of a bonding process, the final state of the operands is different from the initial state, with the difference being described by the new, process-induced properties.…”

Section: Adhesive Bonding Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Introduction to Recent Advances in Quality Assessment for Adhesive Bonding Technology

Noeske

Cavalcanti

Brüning

et al. 2021

Adhesive Bonding of Aircraft Composite Structures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The first chapter highlights the relevance of both adhesive bonding technology and in-process quality assessment for mastering twenty-first-century challenges in joining functional and lightweight materials like carbon fibre reinforced polymers. The ongoing developments of the relevant technological and regulatory procedures and frameworks are hereby outlined, following trends for data-driven innovation and standardisation. Advances from monitoring process variables towards the in-depth and objective Extended Non-destructive Testing (ENDT) of material-related features are presented, based on methodological and technological innovation and insights from recent European joint research projects like Horizon 2020s ComBoNDT—“Quality assurance concepts for adhesive bonding of aircraft composite structures by advanced NDT”. Introducing ten heuristic principles for quality assessment in bonding processes, a concept is demonstrated for establishing empirically consolidated sets of quantitative material and process-specific correlations between design-relevant joint features and quality data measured during the manufacture or repair of adhesive joints using ENDT. Each correlation is obtained by systematically introducing disturbances of relevant process features identified by experts and is levelled once by linking findings from standardised mechanical tests with ENDT results obtained for joints that have intentionally been manufactured or repaired in an off-specification way. Subsequent chapters will demonstrate the suitability of the broadly applicable process.

show abstract

Section: Adhesive Bonding Processesmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Adhesive Bonding Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Adhesive Bonding Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Introduction to Recent Advances in Quality Assessment for Adhesive Bonding Technology

Noeske

Cavalcanti

Brüning

et al. 2021

Adhesive Bonding of Aircraft Composite Structures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Die durch MATTMANN [10] entwickelte Methodik basiert auf der Modellierung jeweils eines Modellraumes für die Prozess-und Produktlösung und deren durchgängige Verknüpfung zum Anforderungsraum. Die Transformation der Produkt-und Prozessmodelle basiert dabei auf Soll-Eigenschaften und -Größen, welche auf Projektionsebenen in Beziehung mit den entsprechenden Anforderungen gesetzt werden.…”

Section: Modellintegrierte Produkt-und Prozessentwicklungunclassified

“…Eine weitere Einteilungsart nach MATTMANN [10] ist das sogenannte Clustering von Anforderungen, sprich die Bildung semantischer Gruppen für die Einordnung von Einzelanforderungen. Der Vorteil der Clusterbildung ist beispielsweise die Identifizierung bereits bekannter Lösungen einzelner Anforderungscluster, wodurch ebendiese wiederverwendet werden können.…”

Section: Modellintegrierte Produkt-und Prozessentwicklungunclassified

Ein Klassifizierungssystem zur Anforderungssystematisierung

Horber¹,

Erlangen-Nürnberg²,

Schleich³

et al. 2019

DFX 2019: Proceedings of the 30th Symposium Design for X, 18-19 September 2019, Jesteburg, Germany

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a holistic approach to structure and classify requirements of the product life cycle systematically and make them accessible for the evaluation process. In a first analysis step, process models of selected literature are analyzed regarding classification and structuring of requirements as well as their derivation into evaluation criteria. In a subsequent synthesis step, the classification system is developed with a consistent consideration of the multicriteria evaluation process. This approach therefore contributes to raise the awareness of an appropriate handling of requirements and to minimize forgotten requirements as well as evaluation criteria. As a result, costly iterations in the development process can be reduced sustainably by using the proposed approach.

show abstract