Models and Tools for Managing Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review

Costa, Catarina; Cunha, C.N.L.C. de; Rocha, Rodrigo Tumolin; França, A. César C.; Silva, Fábio Q. B. da; Prikladnicki, Rafael

doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2010.9

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among those studies, some are listed in the next paragraphs. The SLR proposed by [4], where it was selected 25 (twenty five) primary studies from 2001 to 2009, had identified 11 (eleven) models and 24 (twenty four) effective tools for managing DSD. Despite the satisfactory results, this review aim was the identification of models and tools used to support the DSD project management, where each identified model are different from those proposed herein.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaboration Models in Distributed Software Development: a Systematic Review

Rocha

Costa

Rodrigues

et al. 2011

CLEIej

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several years ago software development has become critical to the global market. In the past decade, as a reflection of globalization, software companies began to distribute their development processes in different places, creating distributed software development (DSD). With the growing of Distributed Software Development, organizations have attempt to sketch the best possible development structure, in order to improve productivity and quality. The aim of this paper is to present a Systematic Review of Literature to identify which ways of collaboration are commonly used by software organizations where teams are temporal and geographically dispersed, with also different native languages and culture. Further, the research was based on the basic life cycle of the traditional development, and where phases of the project are performed: onsite, distributed/offshore and multi-site. The systematic review have examined 868 papers published between 2000 and 2010.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%