2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9195-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for Dynamic Fracture Based on Griffith’s Criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in the quasi-static case, the ( ) limit as ε → 0 of the regularized model is well known, its derivation in our model is a very complicated and largely open mathematical problem which we do not address in this study. For a discussion of corresponding sharp-interface models, see Larsen (2010). The work presented here is quite theoretical by nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While in the quasi-static case, the ( ) limit as ε → 0 of the regularized model is well known, its derivation in our model is a very complicated and largely open mathematical problem which we do not address in this study. For a discussion of corresponding sharp-interface models, see Larsen (2010). The work presented here is quite theoretical by nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, since a stationary crack will always satisfy the above criteria, one needs to add a principle requiring that, in certain situations, the crack must grow. Such a principle, termed maximal dissipation, was formulated in [13], in a weak sense that does not require regularity of the crack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception to this is given by phase-field models, which were formulated and studied in [2,14]. These papers led to the maximal dissipation approach proposed in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions i) and ii) follow, e.g., from [15], and a principle like iii) is necessary, since otherwise a stationary crack with elastodynamics off of it will always be a solution. In [16] this is discussed in some more detail, and a maximal dissipation condition is proposed for iii), but it is too early to claim any acceptance of this principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we are unable to prove uniqueness or energy balance. We note that a lack of energy balance, where the energy includes only the kinetic and elastic energies, is in fact desirable, as only then can the total energy, including the surface energy of the crack, be balanced, as in the models formulated in [16]. We also note that a natural idea for proving existence for those models, which in addition to balance of the total energy have a maximality property of Γ(t) , would be to find u n (t i+1 ) and Γ n (t i+1 ) by minimizing…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%