2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/comsnets.2011.5716492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of 802.11 multi-hop networks: Theoretical insights and experimental validation

Abstract: Abstract-Wireless Multi-Hop CSMA/CA Networks are challenging to analyze. On the one hand, their dynamics are complex and rather subtle effects may severely affect their performance. Yet, understanding these effects is critical to operate upper layer protocols, such as TCP/IP. On the other hand, their models tend to be very complex in order to reproduce all the features of the protocol. As a result, they do not convey much insight into the essential features.We review two models of 802.11 protocols, which are s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, most of the analytical studies on IEEE 802.11 are devoted to either cell networks, or multi-hop networks with single-hop flow [2,11,5,9]. Considering the few works dealing with multi-hop flows [1,6], they consider simplifying assumptions (e.g. buffers with infinite length to queue extra datagrams, ideal physical layer for transmitting frames, specific scenarios where the network is overloaded or even totally saturated) that significantly deviate from some of the fundamental properties arising in IEEE 802.11 chains, and thus they may not be accurate when applied to realistic scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, most of the analytical studies on IEEE 802.11 are devoted to either cell networks, or multi-hop networks with single-hop flow [2,11,5,9]. Considering the few works dealing with multi-hop flows [1,6], they consider simplifying assumptions (e.g. buffers with infinite length to queue extra datagrams, ideal physical layer for transmitting frames, specific scenarios where the network is overloaded or even totally saturated) that significantly deviate from some of the fundamental properties arising in IEEE 802.11 chains, and thus they may not be accurate when applied to realistic scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to the case of multi-hop flows, i.e., flows whose source and destination can not directly communicate, there is only a handful of works that have tackled analytically the performance analysis of flows conveyed through a path. In [12], Aziz et al highlighted some of the complex phenomena emerging in a wireless path (e.g., mutual exclusion of links and unfairness between the nodes). In particular, they studied the evolution of the queue length at the buffer nodes, and they emphasized their correlation (some queues may be empty, while others are not).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to these networks as chains. There is only a handful of works specifically devoted to the analytical performance evaluation of such chains based on IEEE 802.11 [2,4,1]. Besides, it seems that none of them handles at the same time realistic assumptions regarding the behavior of the MAC protocol, the inter-dependencies in the distribution of the workload among the nodes (some nodes may be in saturation while others may be in starvation) and the hidden node problem, which are fundamental properties of a wireless chain with several nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%