2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2013.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of atoms in plasmas based on common formalism for bound and free electrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The NPA method applies for low T systems even with transient covalent bonding. Hence, we differ from Blenski et al [24] who hold that "... all quantum models seem to give unrealistic description of atoms in plasma at low T and high plasma densities". But in reality, the earliest successful applications of the NPA were for solids at T = 0.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NPA method applies for low T systems even with transient covalent bonding. Hence, we differ from Blenski et al [24] who hold that "... all quantum models seem to give unrealistic description of atoms in plasma at low T and high plasma densities". But in reality, the earliest successful applications of the NPA were for solids at T = 0.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…We typically use R c = 10r ws , i.e., a volume of some 1000 atoms. Several average-atom models [23,24] have similarities and significant differences among them and with the NPA method. These are reviewed in the Appendix and in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In atom‐in‐plasma models, the free electron density pileup δn f ( r ) is restricted to the ions sphere ; they cannot adequately capture such transient bonding effects, whereas the NPA used here does so as δn f ( r ) extends up to R c , covering the bonding region between the WS sphere of the central ion and any field ion. The NPA uses an “average ion,” which is rigorously a single DFT representative of all the different possible electronic configurations of the physical ion, including transient bonding states.…”
Section: The Neutral Pseudo‐atom Model (Npa) In the Context Of Complementioning
confidence: 59%
“…It should be emphasized that such features (i.e., the first peak in the g ( r ) etc.) are unlikely to be captured by the common ion‐sphere atom‐in‐plasma models or those based on Lieberman's model as they limit the electron pileup at the pseudo‐ions to within the ion‐spheres, where as the C–C bonding requires an increased density in middle regions between the ions outside the ions spheres.…”
Section: The Neutral Pseudo‐atom Model (Npa) In the Context Of Complementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now the most used models are still essentially based on the ion-in-cell picture [12][13][14]. Some progress towards a variational formulation of quantum atom-in-plasma models was achieved [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, it relies on a very simple hypothesis on ion-ion correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%