2012
DOI: 10.7763/ijtef.2012.v3.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of Foreign Direct Investments Influence on Economic Growth. Evidence from Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The original annual data for 1992-2012 were taken from the OECD's public database. The adoption of the above-mentioned explanatory variables for GDP results from the make-up of the Cobb-Douglas component functions and research methodology adopted by many authors, among others, by Dimelis -Papoioannou (2010), Roman -Padureanu (2012), and Driffield -Jindra (2012), who analysed the FDI effect on economic growth in host countries.…”
Section: Results Of Selected Empirical Analyses Of the Fdi-economic Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original annual data for 1992-2012 were taken from the OECD's public database. The adoption of the above-mentioned explanatory variables for GDP results from the make-up of the Cobb-Douglas component functions and research methodology adopted by many authors, among others, by Dimelis -Papoioannou (2010), Roman -Padureanu (2012), and Driffield -Jindra (2012), who analysed the FDI effect on economic growth in host countries.…”
Section: Results Of Selected Empirical Analyses Of the Fdi-economic Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Tang, Selvanatha, and Selvanathan (2008) investigate the causal link between foreign direct investment, domestic investment and economic growth in China and show that domestic investment and economic growth are positively correlated and find a bi-directional causality between them. Roman and Padureanu (2012) analysed the relation between domestic investments, FDIs and economic growth using a Cobb-Douglas function and proved a positive relationship. Ionescu (2015) showed that the worst situation of the FDIs in Romania after the crisis is accompanied by low domestic investment flows and pointed out the negative impact of some political and institutional factors on investments.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benzuidenhout [11] found a negative relationship between FDI and growth but no relationship between aid and growth. Roman and Padureanu [49] found that FDI and capital endowments are positively correlated with GDP in Romania, but what was not expected was the fact that the human capital was negatively correlated with GDP evolution. As the authors stated, the last fact is explained by the reduction of Romanian population in 1995-2004.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 89%