2019
DOI: 10.1075/tsl.126.02afa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of grammar and the outcomes of long-term language contact

Abstract: In this paper, we lay the groundwork for an explanation of the language mixing outcomes witnessed in the grammar of contemporary Dakkhini, which is the result of long-term diachronic contact between Hindi/Urdu and Telugu. We argue that an Exoskeletal Frame Model is well suited to account both for Dakkhini-type contact outcomes, and for “online” code-switching outcomes. The key element of our model is the assumption of a distinction between an underlying abstract syntactic skeleton and the instantiation of that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the model takes the Matrix Language and the Embedded Language as "theoretical primitives", that is, "it assumes that the language faculty would identify individual languages to give them the roles of Matrix Language or Embedded Language" (Riksem, 2018, p. 49). Besides, this model is concerned with bilingual performance and not with competence, so the two principles proposed under the MLF (Morpheme Order Principle and the System Morpheme Principle) should only be considered as observational generalizations (Åfarli & Subbarao, 2019;González-Vilbazo & López, 2011). Furthermore, the MLF model has been regarded as a "extremely limiting" view of codeswitching, since it pays little attention to dependencies (López, 2020).…”
Section: … Eso Ya Lo Pusimos Dentro Del Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, the model takes the Matrix Language and the Embedded Language as "theoretical primitives", that is, "it assumes that the language faculty would identify individual languages to give them the roles of Matrix Language or Embedded Language" (Riksem, 2018, p. 49). Besides, this model is concerned with bilingual performance and not with competence, so the two principles proposed under the MLF (Morpheme Order Principle and the System Morpheme Principle) should only be considered as observational generalizations (Åfarli & Subbarao, 2019;González-Vilbazo & López, 2011). Furthermore, the MLF model has been regarded as a "extremely limiting" view of codeswitching, since it pays little attention to dependencies (López, 2020).…”
Section: … Eso Ya Lo Pusimos Dentro Del Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been an increasing interest in incorporating other constraintfree approaches, such as the non-lexicalist approach, in the study of codeswitching with the belief that previous models (i.e., the MLF model or the MP) fell short in explaining certain switched sequences, such as word-internal switches (Åfarli, 2015;Åfarli & Subbarao, 2019;Alexiadou & Lohndal, 2018;González-Vilbazo & López, 2011) or because these proposals were too restrictive to analyze switches within, for example, the DP (Burkholder, 2018;Grimstad et al, 2018;López, 2020;Riksem, 2018).…”
Section: Other Constraint-free Approaches: the Non-lexicalist Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%