2011
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of Sexual and Relational Orientation: A Critical Review and Synthesis

Abstract: Many frameworks exist to explain and describe the phenomenon of same‐sex sexuality as it applies to human development. This conceptual article provides a critical overview and synthesis of previous models to serve as a theoretical bridge for the suggested multiple continua model of sexual and relational orientations. Recommendations for how counselors can adapt the multiple continua model to improve their work with same‐sex sexual clients are presented, and future directions for research are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with what is represented in early literature stemming from Kinsey's (1948) original observation that there is a continuum of sexual attraction rather than a simple dichotomy in which everyone is either exclusively attracted to the same-sex or the opposite-sex. Advancing beyond Kinsey's linear and zero-sum scale of sexual attraction, Moe, Reicherzer, and Dupuy (2011) suggest that multiple scales are needed to represent sexual and relational identification adequately. In keeping with this idea, two continuums were used in this study to define and measure SSA and OSA as independently operating variables.…”
Section: Sexual Attractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with what is represented in early literature stemming from Kinsey's (1948) original observation that there is a continuum of sexual attraction rather than a simple dichotomy in which everyone is either exclusively attracted to the same-sex or the opposite-sex. Advancing beyond Kinsey's linear and zero-sum scale of sexual attraction, Moe, Reicherzer, and Dupuy (2011) suggest that multiple scales are needed to represent sexual and relational identification adequately. In keeping with this idea, two continuums were used in this study to define and measure SSA and OSA as independently operating variables.…”
Section: Sexual Attractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They regard selective visibility to be a type of ‘safe and comfortable participation’ for queer users (p. 1). The main cause of selective visibility outside China is social pressure in general and ‘stigma related to heterosexism and homo-prejudice’ (Moe et al, 2011: 229) in particular. Partly because of this pressure, some queer users choose to disclose sexual orientation only to some of their friends on Facebook (Jerome and Hadzmy, 2022).…”
Section: Playing Edge-ball and Selective Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple Continua Model of Sexual and Relational Orientations. One of the few scales to represent multiple ways that sexual orientation may be conceptualized by the individual, the Multiple Continua Model of Sexual and Relational Orientations is also a measure specifically designed for clinical populations (MCM; Moe, Reicherzer, & Dupuy, 2011). Five continua are assessed: desire of sex characteristics (ranging from strong preference for male genitalia to female genitalia, and male secondary sex characteristics to female secondary sex characteristics), desire of gender expression (masculine to feminine), sexual and relational interest (low interest to high interest), relational orientation (same gender to other gender preference), and community identification (low identification with LGBT community to high identification).…”
Section: Attraction/intimacy Assessment Inventory (Aiai)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors suggest selecting five questions from each sub scale to be an appropriate solution to shorten this scale. Multiple Continua Model of Sexual and Relational Orientations (Moe et al, 2011) This scale, while not simple for statistical analysis, provides a thorough yet concise approach to assessing multiple aspects of sexual orientation. However, more evidence is needed to support its validity, and alterations have been suggested.…”
Section: Deeper Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%