2014
DOI: 10.5751/ace-00699-090207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models to predict the distribution and abundance of breeding ducks in Canada

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Detailed knowledge of waterfowl abundance and distribution across Canada is lacking, which limits our ability to effectively conserve and manage their populations. We used 15 years of data from an aerial transect survey to model the abundance of 17 species or species groups of ducks within southern and boreal Canada. We included 78 climatic, hydrological, and landscape variables in Boosted Regression Tree models, allowing flexible response curves and multiway interactions among variables. We assessed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We might have expected greater differences between modeling strategies had we created finely tuned species-specific models with reduced predictor sets. Because BRTs show higher variability in extrapolated predictions compared to interpolated predictions (Kusiak et al 2010;Barker et al 2014), we speculate that differences between modeling strategies might be greater when predicting outside the study area or outside species ranges. The particular result would depend on individual species' ranges and data quality, the environmental conditions within and outside the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We might have expected greater differences between modeling strategies had we created finely tuned species-specific models with reduced predictor sets. Because BRTs show higher variability in extrapolated predictions compared to interpolated predictions (Kusiak et al 2010;Barker et al 2014), we speculate that differences between modeling strategies might be greater when predicting outside the study area or outside species ranges. The particular result would depend on individual species' ranges and data quality, the environmental conditions within and outside the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore reduced the variable set by calculating seasonal means for precipitation and for minimum and maximum temperature. We did not execute further dimension reduction techniques because we wished to maintain ecological interpretability of each variable, which we discuss elsewhere (Barker et al 2014) To limit the source of variation among model results to modeling strategy, we used the same set of predictor variables for all models instead of finely tuning models with speciesspecific variables.…”
Section: Environmental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ante la falta de datos histó-ricos para estas variables, se recomienda que los trabajos de monitoreo colecten esta información periódicamente. Aunque el uso de imágenes de satélites podría mejorar para análisis espaciales de gran escala (Barker et al, 2014a), en nuestro caso fueron limitados por la falta de correspondencia temporal en la fenología de los cultivos con la presencia de las aves.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…We modeled avian mean relative abundance as the performanceweighted average of 20 BRT models generated for each species (as in Barker et al 2014). We assessed the performance of each model by cross-validation using spatially stratified subsampling.…”
Section: Abundance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generated 20 training and test datasets for each modeled species in order to accurately assess model performance and to generate ensemble estimates of abundance robust to the data partitioning process (Barker et al 2014). Training and test datasets were generated using a masked geographically structured (Radosavljevic and Anderson 2014) sub-setting routine that randomly assigns points to training and test datasets at a ratio of 5:1 based on a 5-km grid overlaid on the study area.…”
Section: Appendix 1 Supplementary Information On Boosted Regression mentioning
confidence: 99%