1998
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.

Abstract: The MODELTEST package, including the source code and some documentation is available at http://bioag.byu. edu/zoology/crandall_lab/modeltest.html.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

21
11,711
0
77

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18,439 publications
(11,809 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
21
11,711
0
77
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal model of evolution for each gene data set using the supertree as a reference tree was determined using ModelTEST [123] in combination with PAUP* under an Akaike information criterion (AIC) as implemented in the Perl script autoMT.pl v1.0. The applicability of a molecular clock was tested using a likelihood ratio test with a nominal P of 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons using a sequential Holm-Bonferroni correction [124].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal model of evolution for each gene data set using the supertree as a reference tree was determined using ModelTEST [123] in combination with PAUP* under an Akaike information criterion (AIC) as implemented in the Perl script autoMT.pl v1.0. The applicability of a molecular clock was tested using a likelihood ratio test with a nominal P of 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons using a sequential Holm-Bonferroni correction [124].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum likelihood (ML) tree construction was based on the MLST sequences and the best‐fitting ML model under the Akaike information criterion was GTR (general time reversible) + Γ (gamma distribution) for nucleotides as identified by ModelTest (Posada & Crandall, 1998). The most likely DNA tree and corresponding bootstrap support values were obtained by PhyML using Mega 5.0 software (Tamura et al., 2011) with nearest‐neighbor interchange branch swapping and 100 bootstrap replicates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As only a single model of molecular evolution can be used across the partitions, the ML analysis was performed with the GTRMIX model and 1000 bootstrap replicates were run. The model of molecular evolution applied to each gene partition in the Bayesian analysis, GTR+I+G, was estimated in jModeltest 2.1.4 (Darriba et al 2012) using the Akaike information criterion (Posada and Crandall 1998). The Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (B/MCMC) analyses were run in MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2003; Ronquist et al 2005) with six chains simultaneously, each initiated with a random tree, for 10 million generations; trees were sampled every 100th generation for a total sample of 100 000 trees.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%