2006
DOI: 10.1080/16066350500497983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderate alcohol use and reduced mortality risk: Systematic error in prospective studies

Abstract: The majority of prospective studies on alcohol use and mortality risk indicates that abstainers are at increased risk of mortality from both all causes and coronary heart disease (CHD). This meta-analysis of 54 published studies tested the extent to which a systematic misclassification error was committed by including as 'abstainers' many people who had reduced or stopped drinking, a phenomenon associated with ageing and ill health. The studies judged to be error free found no significant all-cause or cardiac … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
260
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
6
260
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it seems likely that the findings from this cohort do not refute the protective effect of alcohol on mortality for all of humanity. However, if we are brave enough to generalize the findings from this study and the deviant metaanalysis [1] to health-conscious populations, then there are two items of note. First, there is no protection from alcohol for members of such a population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it seems likely that the findings from this cohort do not refute the protective effect of alcohol on mortality for all of humanity. However, if we are brave enough to generalize the findings from this study and the deviant metaanalysis [1] to health-conscious populations, then there are two items of note. First, there is no protection from alcohol for members of such a population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All but one meta-analysis agree on this point. The deviant one [1] found no protection, but was shown to have errors in the selection of studies and interpretation of findings [2][3][4]. A new input to the body of available evidence on the protective effect is published in this issue [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, should we be just reporting significant and large heterogeneity in study results, or perhaps seek to conduct meta-analysis with increasingly strict quality criteria? This latter approach was used by Fillmore et al [12], and is worthy of being re-visited in light of the many new studies published since that particular meta-analysis was conducted-Fillmore et al …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol intake varies in the same individuals over time, declining with increasing age in many countries [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This decline has been shown to occur among those individuals most vulnerable to morbidity and mortality [8][9][10]. People most likely to be stable in their drinking-the light or moderate drinkers-tend to have the most favourable health characteristics [11,12].…”
Section: Commentary On Britton Et Al (2010):the Dangers Of Decliningmentioning
confidence: 99%