2014
DOI: 10.1509/jm.13.0075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderating Effects of the Relationship between Private Label Share and Store Loyalty

Abstract: A key benefit of private labels for retailers is their potential to increase customers’ store loyalty. However, previous research has not examined how this relationship varies across customers and situations. This study contributes to knowledge in this area by developing a conceptual framework that guides the investigation of the role of four moderating factors in strengthening the private label brand share–store loyalty link: (1) customers’ price-oriented behavior, (2) degree of commoditization of the product… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some recent studies indicate that private-label -based store loyalty might only hold at intermediate levels of private-label purchases. Heavy buyers instead tend to be less loyal to a specific store and prefer private-label products in general, irrespective of the chain that sells them (Ailawadi, Pauwels, and Steenkamp 2008;Koschate-Fischer, Cramer, and Hoyer 2014). Therefore, we predict a U-shaped relationship, such that private-label buyers are less inclined to reallocate purchases from competitive chains when they exhibit intermediate private-label purchase shares with competitors but more willing to reallocate purchases to the chain whose online channel they use when they purchase either very low or very high shares of private-label products from competitors.…”
Section: Habitual Purchase Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some recent studies indicate that private-label -based store loyalty might only hold at intermediate levels of private-label purchases. Heavy buyers instead tend to be less loyal to a specific store and prefer private-label products in general, irrespective of the chain that sells them (Ailawadi, Pauwels, and Steenkamp 2008;Koschate-Fischer, Cramer, and Hoyer 2014). Therefore, we predict a U-shaped relationship, such that private-label buyers are less inclined to reallocate purchases from competitive chains when they exhibit intermediate private-label purchase shares with competitors but more willing to reallocate purchases to the chain whose online channel they use when they purchase either very low or very high shares of private-label products from competitors.…”
Section: Habitual Purchase Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fastmoving consumer goods can be defined as frequently purchased, low-involvement goods that are sold at relatively low cost (Nijssen 1999;Silayoi and Speece 2007;Cleeren et al 2013), such as household products, food, alcoholic beverages, soft drinks, tobacco products, and personal care (Koschate-Fischer et al 2014;Olsen et al 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding perceived quality, PLs traditionally offer consumers lower and fairlypriced products, very similar in quality to national brands (Koschate-Fischer et al 2014). Yet, consumers consider PL brands as being inferior to national brands-low-quality products or, at least, of lower quality than national products.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%