2018
DOI: 10.28920/dhm48.1.17-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern assessment of pulmonary function in divers cannot rely on old reference values

Abstract: Using a valid database of reference values increases accuracy and might prevent additional medical investigations and/or incorrect assessment of fitness to dive. Although our algorithm needs further evaluation to ensure its validity, the preliminary results are promising. Whatever algorithm is used, we urge dive medical physicians to consider using valid reference sets when analysing PFT for assessment of fitness to dive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eligible for inclusion were healthy, non-smoking divers of the Royal Netherlands Navy. Eligible participants were fit to dive according to the European Diving Technology Committee standards, with the exception that PFT was assessed using the reference values of the Global Lung Function Initiative (Wendling and Nome, 2004; Wingelaar et al, 2018). Exclusion criteria were: recent respiratory tract infection, daily use of two or more alcoholic beverages, and/or the use of (over-the-counter) medication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligible for inclusion were healthy, non-smoking divers of the Royal Netherlands Navy. Eligible participants were fit to dive according to the European Diving Technology Committee standards, with the exception that PFT was assessed using the reference values of the Global Lung Function Initiative (Wendling and Nome, 2004; Wingelaar et al, 2018). Exclusion criteria were: recent respiratory tract infection, daily use of two or more alcoholic beverages, and/or the use of (over-the-counter) medication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligible for inclusion were healthy, non-smoking personnel of the Royal Netherlands Navy, who were fit to dive according to the European Diving Technology Committee standards; with the exception that pulmonary function tests (PFT) were assessed using the reference values of the Global Lung Function Initiative (Wendling et al, 2004; Wingelaar et al, 2018). Exclusion criteria were: recent respiratory tract infection, daily use of two or more alcoholic beverages, and/or the use of (over-the-counter) medication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In compliance with international professional standards, military divers in the Netherlands undergo yearly medical assessments, including routine CXR (AP and lateral) at initial assessment, at the Royal Netherlands Navy Diving Medical Center (Wendling and Nome, 2004). Additionally, divers were referred to a military pulmonary specialist for HRCT imaging when spirometry showed a vital capacity >120% higher than ERS/ECSC-1993 reference values, even though a diver could have been free of symptoms of pulmonary disease [The latter practice has since been abandoned, as it was found to be inaccurate when using modern GLI-2012 reference values (Wingelaar et al, 2018;Wingelaar-Jagt et al, 2020)]. The records of all divers who underwent CXR and HRCT between January 2013 and June 2018 were included in this study.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our old protocol, subjects with a vital capacity ≥120% higher than predicted by the ERS/ECSC-1993 guidelines were regarded as abnormal and referred to a pulmonary specialist. New insights gained from the GLI-2012 guidelines made these criteria obsolete (Wingelaar et al, 2018;Wingelaar-Jagt et al, 2020). Because almost all of our subjects had a PFT within 95% of normal (i.e., a Z-score of ±1.96), the subgroups would have been too small for accurate analysis.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%