1980
DOI: 10.1070/pu1980v023n10abeh005040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern interpretation of J.I. Frenkel's classical spin theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations of motion for spinning pole-dipole particles were first derived by Mathisson [1] in the context of general relativity, though similar equations, for the case of flat spacetime, had been derived earlier by Frenkel [2] (see also [3]) in a special relativistic treatment applying to a classical model of an electron. These equations have then been further worked out and rederived most notably by Weyssenhoff-Raabe [4,5], Möller [6], Bhabha-Corben [7][8][9], Dixon [10] and Gralla et al [11], in the framework of special relativity; and in general relativity by Papapetrou [12], who carried out an exact derivation for pole-dipole particles, Tulczyjew [13], Taub [14], Dixon [15,16] and Souriau [17,18], who made derivations covariant at each step, and more recently Natário [19] and Gralla et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations of motion for spinning pole-dipole particles were first derived by Mathisson [1] in the context of general relativity, though similar equations, for the case of flat spacetime, had been derived earlier by Frenkel [2] (see also [3]) in a special relativistic treatment applying to a classical model of an electron. These equations have then been further worked out and rederived most notably by Weyssenhoff-Raabe [4,5], Möller [6], Bhabha-Corben [7][8][9], Dixon [10] and Gralla et al [11], in the framework of special relativity; and in general relativity by Papapetrou [12], who carried out an exact derivation for pole-dipole particles, Tulczyjew [13], Taub [14], Dixon [15,16] and Souriau [17,18], who made derivations covariant at each step, and more recently Natário [19] and Gralla et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained in this way operator equations coincide completely in form with corresponding classical equations ath → 0, but provided the terms with the Plank constant in the latter equations should be also tended to zero (see also quasiclassical BMT approximation [12] et al). At the same time this result means that the problem of correlation between the classical and quantum Zitterbewegung remains vague.…”
Section: Correspondence Principle In the Spin Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the Shirokov and Frenkel formulations the spin equations coincide with the equation (21) up to terms linear in the external field. As far as the charge equation of motion are concerned they coincide with equations (11) and (12) in the linear approximations in powers ofh and in field (see also in Ref. [36], p.51).…”
Section: Spin Equation In the Shirokov Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations