"Modern Linnaeus": A class exercise on plant nomenclature and taxonomy in comparison with a previous experiment

Savo, Valentina; Bisceglie, Sara; Caneva, Giulia; Kumbaric, Alma; McClatchey, Will; Reedy, David

doi:10.17348/era.9.0.217-233

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Scientific taxonomy aims to objectively classify all species according to their evolutionary relationships [32]. Folk taxonomy investigated in this, and other studies shows a classification system based on evolutionary groupings in nature [32], with genera being the most recognizable taxonomic level [4, 11, 33]. The folk classification investigated in this study was found to rely on frogs’ habits, habitats, or appearance when grouping species together.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Folk taxonomy and indigenous names for frogs in Zululand, South Africa

Phaka

Netherlands

Kruger

et al. 2019

J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWe use taxonomy to organize the world into recognizable units. Folk taxonomy deals with the naming and classification of organisms through culture. Unlike its scientific counterpart, folk taxonomy is mostly undocumented, the Zoological Code of Nomenclature does not regulate it, and the resulting names are specific to each culture. A growing body of literature is steadily shedding light on the principles underlying this pre-scientific taxonomy. Vernacular names can be an instrument to increase participation of non-scientists in biodiversity matters. In South Africa, great strides have been made in standardizing and increasing relatability of vernacular amphibian names in English and Afrikaans. However, there is a need to achieve the same with the country’s autochthonous languages which are used by a majority of the population.MethodsThis study investigates amphibian-related folk taxonomy using a semi-structured interview process in KwaZulu-Natal’s Zululand region and pilots methods of applying folk taxonomy principles to compile a comprehensive list of standardized indigenous frog names.ResultsFolk taxonomy in Zululand is systematic, developed, and bears similarities to other indigenous taxonomies around the world. Similarities also exist between folk and scientific taxonomy. Six uninomial indigenous names were found to be used for the 58 amphibian species occurring in the study area. The 58 species were assigned individual indigenous names using folk taxonomy guidelines supplemented with guidelines for modern taxonomies.ConclusionsThere is a gap in the documentation and investigation of amphibian folk taxonomy in South Africa. Standardization of indigenous frog names is required to increase their universality. Similarities between folk and modern taxonomies allow for supplementation of indigenous guidelines when compiling a comprehensive indigenous species list. Through this study, social inclusion in wildlife matters is increased, indigenous knowledge systems are promoted, and a contribution is made to the development of an indigenous South African language.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13002-019-0294-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract