2007
DOI: 10.1201/9781420062281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Missile Guidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, z > 0 and p > 0 for this system. Therefore, the all-stabilizing controller set is given by 34 Considering the relation 75, the all-stabilizing k p range is given as follows À4:29859 < k p < 5:27732…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, z > 0 and p > 0 for this system. Therefore, the all-stabilizing controller set is given by 34 Considering the relation 75, the all-stabilizing k p range is given as follows À4:29859 < k p < 5:27732…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common feature of biproper systems with time delay in the closed loop is that they form a class of delay equations of a neutral type, for which there may be many right half-plane roots under particular circumstances, which require a stronger stability condition to be checked [31]. Even though, from the physical process viewpoint, they are rarer than the strictly proper ones, there are some processes such as seeker dynamics in missiles [32][33][34][35][36], thermal-electrical models of polychromatic and high-power LED luminaires [37,38], and force dynamics in robotics under particular circumstances [39,40], which can be modeled by biproper first-order transfer functions. Additionally, a parallel connection of any static and strictly proper first-order process results in a biproper one, which can particularly be the case in mixed chemical processes [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…having normal fin and stabilizer) implemented for orthophoto imaging show better stability (especially lateral) compared to the wing type (i.e. flying wing), the later ones are far more advantageous from compositional point of view -it is far easier to incorporate the imaging camera in such frame while keeping small size and good aerodynamics (Yanushevsky, 2009 Despite the mentioned advantages of "flying wing" configuration, its great disadvantage (which is very difficult to overcome) is high stall speed, which makes it very risky to operate at low speeds. The high stall speed comes from the aerodynamics of the "flying wing" airframe itself -to increase the angle of attack of the wing (to get higher lift force at low speeds) the elevons has to be inclined upwards, which in turn decreases the curvature of the wing, decreasing its lift force.…”
Section: Construction Of the Uavmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This acceleration is acting perpendicular to the instantaneous LOT and is proportional to the LOT angular rate, target closing velocity and navigation constant pr N , which presents effective navigation ratio, and is given by the expression [12],…”
Section: Model Of Impact Kinematics For Simulation Algoritm Based On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… NLOS missile's guidance effective range is calculated from the trajectory made by the method of proportional navigation by supposed LOT (line between target position and NLOS missile), with a flight navigation angles of mentioned vectors and lines using the method of proportional navigation with coefficient N pr =5 [4,11,12]. This value is used as fixed, depending of maneuver lateral constrained acceleration of the NLOS missile orientated to the mobile target area.…”
Section: Supposition For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%