2019
DOI: 10.12691/rpbs-7-1-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Psychometric Analysis of the Muscle Strengthening Activity Scale (MSAS) Using Item Response Theory

Abstract: Background: With the growing need to promote muscle strengthening activity (MSA) for improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) comes the growing need for proper measurement of MSA behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine test and item functioning of the MSA scale (MSAS) using item response theory (IRT). Methods: The current research fit data from a sample of N = 400 respondents to two different graded response models (GRMs), a three-item muscular strength scale and a three-item muscular enduran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the MSEQ, several questionnaires have recently been developed to assess MSE, including the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for assessing the weekly frequency of MSE [42] , the Cancer Prevention Study-3 (CPS-3) for assessing the weekly duration of MSE [43] , and the Muscle-Strengthening Activity Scale (MSAS) for assessing the frequency and duration of muscle-strengthening activities [44] . Owing to the nature of the comprehensive items in the MSEQ Indonesian version, our pilot validity study found the higher validity of the MSEQ Indonesian version for assessing the weekly frequency and duration of MSE compared with the BRFSS in assessing whether participants met the recommended muscle-strengthening activities engagement at least twice per week (Cohen's kappa range 0.40 to 0.52) [42] and the CPS-3 in assessing the weekly duration of MSE (Spearman correlation of 0.71) [43] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the MSEQ, several questionnaires have recently been developed to assess MSE, including the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for assessing the weekly frequency of MSE [42] , the Cancer Prevention Study-3 (CPS-3) for assessing the weekly duration of MSE [43] , and the Muscle-Strengthening Activity Scale (MSAS) for assessing the frequency and duration of muscle-strengthening activities [44] . Owing to the nature of the comprehensive items in the MSEQ Indonesian version, our pilot validity study found the higher validity of the MSEQ Indonesian version for assessing the weekly frequency and duration of MSE compared with the BRFSS in assessing whether participants met the recommended muscle-strengthening activities engagement at least twice per week (Cohen's kappa range 0.40 to 0.52) [42] and the CPS-3 in assessing the weekly duration of MSE (Spearman correlation of 0.71) [43] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item response theory (IRT) is a modern approach to scale validation that entails modeling the relationship between observed responses to items and the latent trait purported to be measured by those items [18]. There are many benefits to IRT over traditional methods and can be found elsewhere [19]. Briefly, with the use of IRT: (1) models can be tested for appropriate fit to data, (2) item parameters are considered invariant to changes in persons (i.e., regardless of sample characteristics), and (3) person parameters are considered invariant to changes in the test (i.e., easy vs. difficult tests).…”
Section: Continuous Response Model (Crm)mentioning
confidence: 99%