Modern slavery and international business scholarship: the governance nexus

Abstract

Purpose Modern slavery is a problem that international business (IB) research can no longer ignore. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are often contributors to the persistence of modern slavery, by virtue of the regulatory challenge they pose to states and their insufficient oversight of supply chains. The purpose of this paper is to show that governance inadequacies with respect to modern slavery will be lessened if IB scholars give more attention to MNEs’ governing role within and beyond global value chains. Design/methodology/approach A set of arguments is presented in support of intensified effort in IB research with respect to studying the role of MNEs in transnational labour governance. The paper draws inspiration from IB theory and the conceptualisation of the MNE in neighbouring disciplines that regard it as a bearer of duties toward labour, consistent with its role in multilevel governance. Insights from the literature on global and multi-level governance are utilised. Findings The paper construes modern slavery as a multi-level governance challenge and argues that MNE capabilities and responsibilities with respect to labour governance and the deterrence of slavery exceed those identified on the margins of IB literature. MNEs are underappreciated as governors within the multilevel transnational labour governance system. The IB discipline is in a strong position to develop our understanding of the MNE’s different roles in governance and thereby contribute to the reduced incidence of modern slavery. Originality/value This paper represents an attempt to mobilise the IB academy to help eliminate slavery from workplaces that rely on MNE patronage or where labour rights abuses are made possible by MNE diversion of governance resources. It places particular emphasis on the use and abuse of MNEs’ governance capabilities in the sphere of international relations and calls attention to over-simplification of the MNE, IB’s primary unit of analysis.

The role of trade narratives in poverty reduction after the COVID-19 crisis

“…These questions illustrate narratives about the negative nature of modern life prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. There are many narratives written with the underlying assumption the current global state of affairs is mostly negative and primarily caused by actors involved in business and international trade, for further examples see Burmester et al (2019), Cohen (2020) and Khalidi (2018).…”

Implementing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals in international business

“…Multinationals can embrace a diverse workforce in terms of gender and ethnicity (Ferner, Almond, & Colling, 2005 ), improving working conditions in their host-country operations and among business partners across their global value chains, where they exercise indirect control. Multinationals can also prevent irresponsible practices, such as child exploitation (Kolk & van Tulder, 2004 ), sweatshop conditions (Radin & Calkins, 2006 ), or modern slavery (Burmester, Michailova, & Stringer, 2019 ), by forbidding them as part of their supply contracts and enforcing such contractual agreements in their global value chains. By taking an extended social responsibility view in their own operations and those of their business partners, multinationals can invest in training and require local value chain partners to ensure decent work conditions across their entire supply chain.…”

Renewable energy in international business

“…While different viewpoints to the contexts, needs and benefits need to be incorporated in IB studies, there is a threat that the conflicts and tensions among market actors remain understudied. By incorporating the dark sides (Burmester et al, 2019;Dörrenbächer and Gammelgaard, 2019;Enderwick, 2019), the research community could provide a more holistic and balanced view of renewable energy in IB.…”