2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern stellar spectroscopy caveats

Abstract: Multiple codes are available to derive atmospheric parameters and individual chemical abundances from high-resolution spectra of AFGKM stars. Almost all spectroscopists have their own preferences regarding which code and method to use. But the intrinsic differences between codes and methods lead to complex systematics that depend on multiple variables such as the selected spectral regions and the radiative transfer code used. I expand iSpec, a popular open-source spectroscopic tool, to support the most well-kn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
149
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned relation was also used for the determination of the systemic velocity of the one RRd star in our sample. In order to determine the systemic velocity of RR Lyrae stars in our sample we extracted single-epoch spectra from the SDSS and measured the radial velocity for the Hα line by crosscorrelation with a synthetic template 14 using the iSpec package routines (Blanco-Cuaresma et al 2014;Blanco-Cuaresma 2019) and MOOG (Sneden 1973, February 2017. Individual radial velocity measurements were phased using the stars' ephemerids with MJDs centered in the middle of the exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned relation was also used for the determination of the systemic velocity of the one RRd star in our sample. In order to determine the systemic velocity of RR Lyrae stars in our sample we extracted single-epoch spectra from the SDSS and measured the radial velocity for the Hα line by crosscorrelation with a synthetic template 14 using the iSpec package routines (Blanco-Cuaresma et al 2014;Blanco-Cuaresma 2019) and MOOG (Sneden 1973, February 2017. Individual radial velocity measurements were phased using the stars' ephemerids with MJDs centered in the middle of the exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the public spectroscopic software iSpec (Blanco-Cuaresma et al 2014a;Blanco-Cuaresma 2019) to analyze the 4 http://archive.eso.org/wdb/wdb/adp/phase3_spectral/ form 5 The archive (http://archives.ia2.inaf.it/tng/faces/ search.xhtml?dswid=-9619) does not allow an automatic search for a large number of stars, so we queried the stars of Rup 147 that we knew in advance had been observed by Bragaglia et al (2018). 6 http://atlas.obs-hp.fr/elodie/ Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atmospheric parameters T eff , log g, [M/H], and [α/M], and the microturbulence parameter mic are inferred for each spectrum using spectral synthesis fitting, in a non-differential way. We used the master line list by Blanco-Cuaresma (2019) and also the wings of Hα, Hβ, and the Mg I b triplet lines.…”
Section: Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valenti & Fischer 2005;Piskunov & Valenti 2017), one of the most widely-used spectroscopic techniques for determining stellar atmospheric parameters. A full account of the key caveats of these two methods can be found in Jofré et al (2019) and Blanco-Cuaresma (2019). The advent of high-resolution near-infrared (NIR) spectrographs such as CARMENES (Quirrenbach et al 2018), SPIRou (Artigau et al 2014), GIANO (Origlia et al 2014;Oliva et al 2018), CRIRES+ (Hatzes & CRIRES+ Team 2017), IRD (Kotani et al 2014), HPF (Wright et al 2018), and NIRPS (Wildi et al 2017) allows us to revisit these techniques, originally applied in the optical, in order to assess the impact of the NIR wavelength range on stellar parameter computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%