Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58552-4_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Techniques in ERP Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, estimation of MRPs using a small number of trials is very difficult because of the negative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which they are recorded. There are many attempts to cope with this problem and to reduce the number of repetitions (surveyed in Lange and Inbar (1999)). Unfortunately, most of these techniques do not show the expected results due to the very low SNR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, estimation of MRPs using a small number of trials is very difficult because of the negative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which they are recorded. There are many attempts to cope with this problem and to reduce the number of repetitions (surveyed in Lange and Inbar (1999)). Unfortunately, most of these techniques do not show the expected results due to the very low SNR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O,, so that LFASD and matched filter are expected to give similar performances signal. Unfortunately, MRPs are never identical and can vary quite significantly from one recording to the next (LANGE and INBAR, 1999). This means that the signal to be detected is not deterministic but rather quasi-deterministic, and the matched filter cannot achieve optimality as a detector.…”
Section: S(t)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2 for different SNR values as a function of~. in MRPs, the SNR is between -20 dB and -10 dB (usually in the vicinity of -15 dB (LANGE and INBAR, 1999)). According to measurements made on the data recorded in the experiments reported below, ~ is between 0.8 and 2.…”
Section: S(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many algorithms have been proposed to detect trialto-trial variability (Bartnik et al 1982;Birch et al 1993;Thakor 1993;Lange and Inbar 1999). Most of these algorithms work well for cognitive evoked potentials with a non-negative SNR, but fail when applied to MRPs which have a highly negative SNR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%