2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18422-7_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Temporal Data Models: Strengths and Weaknesses

Abstract: Abstract. Time is generally a challenging task. All issues in relation to time can be better supported using a temporal data model than implementing them in user applications. More than two-dozen temporal data models have been introduced in time period between 1982 and 1998. After several years of stagnancy, the last couple of years brought the new revival of the topic and the emergence of new data models. Two temporal data models have been specified recently. The one is the SQL:2011 standard, published in 201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of the temporal features in the SQL:2011 standard [58,97], major database vendors have started to implement temporal support in their database management systems [59,73,74]. Some companies realized the need for supporting temporal data earlier, and they extended their database systems with basic temporal features, such as data types, functions, and time travel queries, that make past states of a database available for querying.…”
Section: Temporal Data Support In Commercial Dbmssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the temporal features in the SQL:2011 standard [58,97], major database vendors have started to implement temporal support in their database management systems [59,73,74]. Some companies realized the need for supporting temporal data earlier, and they extended their database systems with basic temporal features, such as data types, functions, and time travel queries, that make past states of a database available for querying.…”
Section: Temporal Data Support In Commercial Dbmssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal support in relational database systems has gained significant interest during the last years, witnessed by temporal features in the SQL:2011 standard [5,28,32] as well as by the numerous database products that offer selected temporal features, such as IBM DB2 [36], Oracle [31], Teradata [1], Microsoft SQL Server [30], and PostgreSQL [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is no temporal query language, like TSQL2 (Snodgrass et al , 1995), or conventional query language with temporal facilities, like SQL:2011 (Kulkarni and Michels, 2012), that supports detecting and/or repairing data inconsistencies resulting from retroactive updates (Etzion et al , 1994). Moreover, although some mainstream commercial DBMSs, including Oracle, IBM DB2, Teradata and MS SQL Server, provide temporal functionalities, as surveyed in (Grandi, 2015; Künzner and Petkovic, 2015; Petkovic, 2015; Petkovic, 2016), none of them supports the management of the effects of retroactive updates on the database consistency. Notice here that, to the best of our knowledge, current ERPs (Monk and Wagner, 2013), including SAP ERP, Oracle ERP, Microsoft Dynamics, Sage Business Solutions, Infor and Epicor, do not allow the management of time-varying data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%