2014
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789x.2014/7-2/4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Transformation of Relations between Production and Consumption

Abstract: In this paper we study the antecedents and consequences of modern transformation which happens with relations between production and consumption. A theoretical justification of the thesis about blurring relationship between growth of consumer's opportunities and resource provision's improvement for human capital accumulation is proposed. The reason for this phenomenon is called the predominance of one from two forms of consumption expansion. Specifically, the predominance of the growth of consumer goods divers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for the description of investments they introduce a sinusoidally dependent function from time. The analyzes carried out by the authors show that an introduction of interest rates sine-dependent investments in time affects significantly the cyclicality of technical work equipment and labor productivity (Kudinova & Verba, 2014;Botrić, Božić, & Broz, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for the description of investments they introduce a sinusoidally dependent function from time. The analyzes carried out by the authors show that an introduction of interest rates sine-dependent investments in time affects significantly the cyclicality of technical work equipment and labor productivity (Kudinova & Verba, 2014;Botrić, Božić, & Broz, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literary sources distinguish between different types of efficiency, among which the three most frequently mentioned are: allocated, dynamic and technological (Bagdonavičius et al, 1999;Lukosevičius et al 2005;Tareck, 2023). Of these, the emphasis is on two: accommodative and technological (Zofio et al, 2013;Susaeta et al, 2016), where the former determines the return of a company using limited resources (AGPC, 2013) -in other words, its ability to produce and realise its products or services at the lowest possible price (Nabradi et al, 2009;Kudinova & Verba, 2014;Rabe et al, 2023). In the context of the CE, it is logical to speak about and calculate technological efficiency as representing the presence of the smallest possible amount of waste at the same or increasing production volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%