Moderne Einschlafstrategien von Kleinkindern

Schlarb, Angelika; Seiler, Denise; Werner, Anika; Kater, Maren-Jo

doi:10.1007/s11818-020-00279-0

Cited by 5 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In total, 16 papers were included in the review (Chindamo et al, 2019; Cook et al, 2022; Coulombe & Reid, 2014; Fiese et al, 2021; Hall et al, 2012; Messayke et al, 2020; Miller et al, 2022; Murthy et al, 2015; Netsi et al, 2017; Plancoulaine et al, 2015; Prokasky et al, 2019; Schlarb et al, 2020; Staples et al, 2015; Staples et al, 2021; Tikotzky et al, 2022; Williamson et al, 2019). The range of publication dates spans 2012 (Hall et al, 2012) to 2022 (Cook et al, 2022; Tikotzky et al, 2022); 10 papers were published 2019–2022 (Chindamo et al, 2019; Cook et al, 2022; Fiese et al, 2021; Messayke et al, 2020; Miller et al, 2022; Prokasky et al, 2019; Schlarb et al, 2020; Staples et al, 2021; Tikotzky et al, 2022; Williamson et al, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data are reported for studies undertaken in USA (five studies) (Fiese et al, 2021; Miller et al, 2022; Prokasky et al, 2019; Staples et al, 2015; Staples et al, 2021), Canada (two) (Coulombe & Reid, 2014; Hall et al, 2012), France (two) (Messayke et al, 2020; Plancoulaine et al, 2015), and one each in Brazil (Netsi et al, 2017), England (Cook et al, 2022), Germany (Schlarb et al, 2020), India (Murthy et al, 2015), Israel (Tikotzky et al, 2022), and Italy (Chindamo et al, 2019). One study was undertaken in multiple countries (Williamson et al, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It should be noted that the quality review focused solely on those aspects of the studies that were relevant to our review question. In all, 10 studies (62.5%) were limited by incomplete or poor reporting of the representativeness of the population (Cook et al, 2022; Fiese et al, 2021; Hall et al, 2012; Miller et al, 2022; Plancoulaine et al, 2015; Prokasky et al, 2019; Schlarb et al, 2020; Staples et al, 2021; Staples et al, 2015; Williamson et al, 2019) and six (37.5%) by incomplete or poor reporting relating to the extent of complete outcome data (Chindamo et al, 2019; Cook et al, 2022; Fiese et al, 2021; Prokasky et al, 2019; Schlarb et al, 2020; Williamson et al, 2019). In all but one case (6.2%) (Murthy et al, 2015), measures used were clearly appropriate and in 10 (62.5%) of the studies confounders of some type were accounted for (Chindamo et al, 2019; Fiese et al, 2021; Messayke et al, 2020; Miller et al, 2022; Murthy et al, 2015; Netsi et al, 2017; Plancoulaine et al, 2015; Prokasky et al, 2019; Staples et al, 2015; Tikotzky et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The design of most studies (11 studies) was cross‐sectional (Chindamo et al, 2019; Cook et al, 2022; Coulombe & Reid, 2014; Hall et al, 2012; Messayke et al, 2020; Miller et al, 2022; Murthy et al, 2015; Prokasky et al, 2019; Schlarb et al, 2020; Staples et al, 2021; Williamson et al, 2019) and the remaining studies were longitudinal (five) (Fiese et al, 2021; Netsi et al, 2017; Plancoulaine et al, 2015; Staples et al, 2015; Tikotzky et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Parental sleep‐related practices and sleep in children aged 1–3 years: a systematic review

Cook,

Carter,

Wiggs

et al. 2023

Journal of Sleep Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThe current systematic review sought to identify the relationship between the range of different parental sleep‐related practices that had been explored in relations to child sleep outcomes in children aged 1–3 years. A systematic literature review was carried out in CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, PubMed and Web of Science, as well as relevant grey literature in August 2022 using the terms; population (children, aged 1–3 years), exposure (parental sleep‐related practice) and outcome (child sleep). Any quantitative study published between 2010 and 2022 that explored the relationship between parental sleep‐related practices and the sleep of children aged 1–3 years were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was employed to quality appraise included studies and results were narratively synthesised. In all, 16 longitudinal and cross‐sectional quantitative studies met inclusion criteria. Parental presence or physical involvement, as well as broader parental practices including using screens or devices at bedtime and night‐time breastfeeding were all related to poorer child sleep outcomes. Consistent and relaxing routines, sleeping in a cot, and spending all night in their own sleep location were associated with better child sleep outcomes. Acknowledging the plethora of diverse parental sleep‐related practices, which may have varying relationships with child sleep outcomes, could be usefully considered in theoretical models and to inform clinical practice. Issues of definitional and measurement ambiguity are highlighted and discussed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Parental sleep‐related practices and sleep in children aged 1–3 years: a systematic review

Cook,

Carter,

Wiggs

et al. 2023

Journal of Sleep Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Intuitively, bedtime stories for children are among the most commonly used strategies of parents to promote their children's sleep. 11 In an online survey, 62% of the respondents reported using music to improve their sleep. 12 This preference to use music as a self-help strategy for sleep is related to its perceived efficacy.…”

Section: Pre-sleep Acoustic Modulation Evidence On the Subjective Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Updated Review of the Acoustic Modulation of Sleep: Current Perspectives and Emerging Concepts

Cordi¹

2021

NSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With growing interest in the use of acoustic stimuli in sleep research and acoustic interventions used therapeutically for sleep enhancement, there is a need for an overview of the current lines of research. This paper summarizes the various ways to use acoustic input before sleep or stimulation during sleep. It thereby focuses on the respective methodological requirements, advantages, disadvantages, potentials and difficulties of acoustic sleep modulation. It highlights differences in subjective and objective outcome measures, immediate and whole night effects and short versus long term effects. This recognizes the fact that not all outcome parameters are relevant in every research field. The same applies to conclusions drawn from other outcome dimensions, consideration of mediating factors, levels of stimulation processing and the impact of inter-individual differences. In addition to the deliberate influences of acoustic input on sleep, one paragraph describes adverse environmental acoustic influences. Finally, the possibilities for clinical and basic research-related applications are discussed, and emerging opportunities are presented. This overview is not a systematic review but aims to present the current perspective and hence summarizes the most up-todate research results and reviews. This is the first review providing a summary of the broad spectrum of possibilities to acoustically influence sleep.

show abstract

Sleep apps for children—a critical view

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background During the last few years, technology support for various health-related areas is becoming increasingly common. Not only are nutrition apps or sports apps available, but apps regarding sleep are also available. As the prevalence of sleep disturbances in infancy and childhood is quite high, supportive strategies are necessary to help families to sleep healthy. Thus, this study addresses the topic of sleep apps for babies and children. Methods Sleep apps were searched using different strings. Age-oriented apps were scored using different criteria which were theoretically based (e.g., description, costs, downloads). Results We found 573 sleep apps using the Apple App Store and Google Play Store with the search strings “sleep” and “app” and “baby” or “children”. Of these, 15.4% were not declared for children or babies. Content of most apps was lullabies or music and songs. Sleep-related aspects as sleep information or sleep education was very rare. Conclusions There is a new field of sleep help—with sleep apps used by families. Because of the high prevalence concerning sleep problems, the market concerning sleep helping apps is well used. However, most of the sleep apps did not have declarations concerning age and other factors. Parents should be careful using sleep apps for their offspring.

show abstract

Moderne Einschlafstrategien von Kleinkindern

Cited by 5 publications

References 38 publications

Parental sleep‐related practices and sleep in children aged 1–3 years: a systematic review

Parental sleep‐related practices and sleep in children aged 1–3 years: a systematic review

Updated Review of the Acoustic Modulation of Sleep: Current Perspectives and Emerging Concepts

Sleep apps for children—a critical view

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About