1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70415-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifiable Factors Associated With Improved Cardiac Arrest Survival in a Multicenter Basic Life Support/Defibrillation System: OPALS Study Phase I Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
1
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
125
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It included ambulance call reports, initial rhythm records, dispatch reports, and survival records. 33,34 This analysis outcome was survival to hospital discharge. This was verified by review of hospital records or an interview of the patient's family physician.…”
Section: Study Setting and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It included ambulance call reports, initial rhythm records, dispatch reports, and survival records. 33,34 This analysis outcome was survival to hospital discharge. This was verified by review of hospital records or an interview of the patient's family physician.…”
Section: Study Setting and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient and care characteristics can predict favourable outcome and this understanding has been incorporated in efforts to improve resuscitation. [1][2][3][4] EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival figures across communities varies approximately 12-fold for both all-rhythms arrests (1.8%-21.5%) and arrests presenting with ventricular fibrillation (3.3-40.5%). 2,[5][6][7][8] Understanding this heterogeneity provides the foundation for improving the care and outcome for cardiac arrest and in turn may impact this public health challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other disease states registries have provided invaluable resources to establish novel prognostic measures that may serve to further the understanding of the pathophysiology or guide patient care. 1,3,5,6,9 To date, no single North American population-based registry from multiple communities exists for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) is supported to conduct randomized clinical trials evaluating promising treatment interventions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and life-threatening trauma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitness of potential solutions were evaluated usingon EMS-distances between census area centroid and potential site. Of the re-allocating ambulances, 23 out of 27 were at existing sites, 4 were allocated to new sites, the average distance increased for 3 sites (by 319m) and decreased for 20 sites (by 630m (Snyder et al, 2007;Stiell et al, 1999). Specifically, several studies have noted the improved survival of patients with a high risk of mortality when the response time was less than 4 to 5 minutes (Blackwell and Kaufman, 2002;Pons et al, 2005) and have sought to improve the response times through enhancing EMS management and relocating ambulance stations (Gossage et al, 2008;Peleg and Pliskin, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the model allows for different numbers of facilities to be located within the solution and their benefits evaluated. As ambulance response time to EMS cases is a critical factor in patient survival (Snyder et al, 2007;Stiell et al, 1999), the approach provides nuanced evidence to those responsible for developing spatial policy. Section 2 describes the scientific context of this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%