2010
DOI: 10.1097/cej.0b013e32833b4828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifiable risk factors and survival in women diagnosed with primary breast cancer: results from a prospective cohort study

Abstract: This study examines the impact of smoking, body mass index, alcohol consumption, hormone replacement therapy, and physical activity on all-cause mortality among 528 Danish women diagnosed with primary breast cancer. Participants were women enrolled in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Prospective self-reported exposure information was collected from four points of follow-up in 1976-1978, 1981-1983, 1991-1994, and 2001-2003. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed adj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After reading full-texts, we excluded studies that were not cohort studies (n =61) and not about survival (n=61). Finally, 25 cohort studies (Hebert et al, 1989;Ewertz et al, 1991;Rohan et al, 1993;Fuchs et al, 1995;Zhang et al, 1995;Thun et al, 1997;Holmes et al, 1999;Saxe et al, 1999;Jain et al, 2000;McDonald et al, 2002;Borugian et al, 2004;Barnett et al, 2008;Dal Maso et al, 2008;Reding et al, 2008;Franceschi et al, 2009;Flatt et al, 2010;Hellmann et al, 2010;Kwan et al, 2010;Allemani et al, 2011;Beasley et al, 2011;Breslow et al, 2011;Harris et al, 2012;Vrieling et al, 2012;Holm et al, 2013;Kwan et al, 2013;Newcomb et al, 2013) (patients) were included ( Figure 1). …”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After reading full-texts, we excluded studies that were not cohort studies (n =61) and not about survival (n=61). Finally, 25 cohort studies (Hebert et al, 1989;Ewertz et al, 1991;Rohan et al, 1993;Fuchs et al, 1995;Zhang et al, 1995;Thun et al, 1997;Holmes et al, 1999;Saxe et al, 1999;Jain et al, 2000;McDonald et al, 2002;Borugian et al, 2004;Barnett et al, 2008;Dal Maso et al, 2008;Reding et al, 2008;Franceschi et al, 2009;Flatt et al, 2010;Hellmann et al, 2010;Kwan et al, 2010;Allemani et al, 2011;Beasley et al, 2011;Breslow et al, 2011;Harris et al, 2012;Vrieling et al, 2012;Holm et al, 2013;Kwan et al, 2013;Newcomb et al, 2013) (patients) were included ( Figure 1). …”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooling all data from highest versus lowest comparisons, alcohol DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.8.4785 Alcohol Consumption and Breast Cancer Survival: A Meta- (Figure 3). 15 studies (Hebert et al, 1989;Zhang et al, 1995;Thun et al, 1997;Saxe et al, 1999;Jain et al, 2000;Barnett et al, 2008;Reding et al, 2008;Franceschi et al, 2009;Hellmann et al, 2010;Allemani et al, 2011;Breslow et al, 2011;Harris et al, 2012;Vrieling et al, 2012;Holm et al, 2013;Newcomb et al, 2013) evaluated the relationship of post-diagnostic alcohol consumption with breast cancer mortality and three studies (Hebert et al, 1989;Saxe et al, 1999;Holm et al, 2013) evaluated the relationship of post-diagnostic alcohol consumption with breast cancer recurrence. And the meta-analysis results showed prediagnostic alcohol consumption was not associated with increased breast cancer mortality (HR1.05, 95%CI 0.93 1.19, I 2 =36%) ( Figure 2) and recurrence (HR1.24, 95%CI 0.89 1.73, I 2 =31%) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations