2021
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11040255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification Approaches to Enhance Dehydration Properties of Sodium Alginate-Based Pervaporation Membranes

Abstract: Transport characteristics of sodium alginate (SA) membranes cross-linked with CaCl2 and modified with fullerenol and fullerene derivative with L-arginine for pervaporation dehydration were improved applying various approaches, including the selection of a porous substrate for the creation of a thin selective SA-based layer, and the deposition of nano-sized polyelectrolyte (PEL) layers through the use of a layer-by-layer (Lbl) method. The impacts of commercial porous substrates made of polyacrylonitrile (PAN), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in Table 1 demonstrate that the PPO/GO (0.1%) and PPO/GO (0.3%) membranes have comparatively the same values of surface roughness within the margin of error, compared to the pristine PPO membrane due to a low GO content in the polymer matrix. Notably, the difference in the surface roughness values (Ra and Rq) of these membranes (PPO, PPO/GO (0.1%), and PPO/GO (0.3%)) did not exceed even 0.8 nm [53]. Only the introduction of GO above 0.5 wt.% significantly increased surface parameters, making it possible to clearly evaluate the contribution of the modification to the change in the membrane surface.…”
Section: Cross-section Surfacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data in Table 1 demonstrate that the PPO/GO (0.1%) and PPO/GO (0.3%) membranes have comparatively the same values of surface roughness within the margin of error, compared to the pristine PPO membrane due to a low GO content in the polymer matrix. Notably, the difference in the surface roughness values (Ra and Rq) of these membranes (PPO, PPO/GO (0.1%), and PPO/GO (0.3%)) did not exceed even 0.8 nm [53]. Only the introduction of GO above 0.5 wt.% significantly increased surface parameters, making it possible to clearly evaluate the contribution of the modification to the change in the membrane surface.…”
Section: Cross-section Surfacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a result, the membranes based on cross-linked sodium alginate were successfully utilized for separation of water and organic media including pervaporative dehydration of various solvents (alcohols, acetic acid, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, etc.) [10,11,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], as the electrolyte material in the methanol fuel cells [25][26][27], aqueous nanofiltration [28][29][30], and very recently for organic solvent nanofiltration [10,31]. The advantage of natural polymers over the synthetic polymers is their biodegradability which simplifies their utilization from an environmental point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the high value of water permeation and selectivity, it is necessary to use polymers with high sorptive centers capable of specific interactions with water [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Some of the polymers, such as poly (acrylic acid) [ 14 , 15 ], poly (vinyl alcohol) [ 16 , 17 ], sodium alginate [ 18 ], hydroxyethyl cellulose [ 19 ], chitosan [ 20 , 21 ], and NaCMC have been recently applied for the fabrication of PV membranes. Among these membrane materials, NaCMC is a highly significant cellulose derivative; it is safe, non-toxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%