2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-008-9211-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of gibberellin signalling (metabolism & signal transduction) in sugar beet: analysis of potential targets for crop improvement

Abstract: Sugar beet, Beta vulgaris spp. vulgaris is a biennial long day plant with an obligate requirement for vernalization (prolonged exposure to low temperature). As a spring crop in temperate European climates, it is vulnerable to vernalization-induced premature bolting and flowering, resulting in reduced crop yield and quality. Gibberellins (GAs) play important roles in key physiological processes including stem elongation (bolting) and flowering and are, therefore, potential targets for controlling reproductive g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, our previous studies (unpublished) have indicated that vernalization-dependent GA-induced developmental processes leading to reproductive growth appear to be localized to the apical shoot meristematic tissues. The role of GA in floral regulatory networks is well established [16] and has been demonstrated for bolting and flowering in sugar beet [8,17]. To perform transcriptome-scale analysis of associated changes in gene expression, we harvested between 30-50 plants per treatment and micro-dissected apical tissues (Figure 1B), under the stereo microscope.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, our previous studies (unpublished) have indicated that vernalization-dependent GA-induced developmental processes leading to reproductive growth appear to be localized to the apical shoot meristematic tissues. The role of GA in floral regulatory networks is well established [16] and has been demonstrated for bolting and flowering in sugar beet [8,17]. To perform transcriptome-scale analysis of associated changes in gene expression, we harvested between 30-50 plants per treatment and micro-dissected apical tissues (Figure 1B), under the stereo microscope.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we cannot conclude with certainty whether the B allele has a direct or an indirect role in the temporal control of the floral phase transitions during bolting in sugar beet. In inductive LDs neither the B allele nor GA affected the rate of flower development when measured as the time taken from floral bud formation to flower opening, and the final bolt height was not affected by GA. We know, however, from previous studies that although GA is not limiting for these processes, it has important roles in both (Mutasa-Göttgens et al , 2009). Here, we also detected gene dose effects from the dominant B allele, resulting in delayed bolting in the heterozygous annual types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…What is not clear is the role of GA or its interactions with the B allele. GA promotes cell elongation as required for bolting and is not normally considered to limit the ability of plants to bolt since, in LDs, the bolting frequency among plants with reduced levels of bioactive GA is not significantly affected (Mutasa-Göttgens et al , 2009). Based on apex height to root ratio values, our results demonstrate that, under inductive LDs, GA has no significant major effects on the induction of bolting ( P > 0.19), which is instead influenced by the B allele ( P < 0.05), without significant interactive effects between the two ( P > 0.22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, breeding programs aim to reduce impurities such as potassium salts, amino acids, and betain that negatively affect sugar extraction (Bosemark 1993). Recent biotechnological improvements using transformation technologies for sugar beet include salt tolerance and the delay of bolting time (Liu et al 2008; Mutasa-Gottgens et al 2009). Furthermore, tissue specific and storage induced genes and their promoters were identified (Kloos et al 2002; Oltmanns et al 2006; Rotthues et al 2008; Stahl et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%