“…For the "picket fence" porphyrin H2PF,THA (the a,a,a,a atropisomer in which the O-amino groups have been converted to hexadecylamides) the substitution of four relatively large hydrophobic groups on one side of the porphyrin forces the porphyrin to occupy a site in which one face of the porphyrin is in a relatively hydrophilic region at or near the film-water interface in films or a hydrophilic-hydrophilic contact plane in deposited multilayers. 14 In contrast previous studies suggest that the other porphyrin used in these studies, meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin tetraoctadecyl ester (TCP,TOE), resides in a more hydrophobic site and that the porphyrin ring is probably bent back from the plane of the film or film layer in multilayers.14,35,41 Since the palladium(II) complexes of porphyrins do not normally strongly coordinate extraplanar ligands,47 it appears reasonable to assume that the palladium porphyrins used in this study, PdPF,THA and PdTCP,TOE, would occupy sites in monolayer films and assemblies similar to those of the respective free bases. This expectation is supported by our findings of very similar surface pressure-area characteristics for films of the palladium complexes and free bases in both cases.…”