2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the saw blade was directed anterosuperiorly toward the sigmoid notch. 13,14 The patients' sutures were removed, and radiographs were taken postoperatively within 7 days.…”
Section: Q4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the saw blade was directed anterosuperiorly toward the sigmoid notch. 13,14 The patients' sutures were removed, and radiographs were taken postoperatively within 7 days.…”
Section: Q4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the changes in the intercondylar distance on transverse plane after IVRO is not significant [ 108 ]. Excessive interference between the segments can induce sagging, thus reduction of bony interference or using a modified osteotomy design should be considered [ 109 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been reports and case series of linear angled variations of ramus osteotomies such as Y or J shapes to allow for minor rotational movements. 21,23,24,25 However, we believe that the curvilinear design of this modified C-osteotomy facilitates greater arc of rotation while optimizing bone contacts between proximal and distal segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%