2019
DOI: 10.1130/abs/2019ne-327980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of Lithospheric Structure Beneath Connecticut via Subduction, Terrane Accretion, and Rifting: Insights From the Seisconn Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At depths greater than about 30 km, the major velocity features in our velocity model are primarily inherited from the reference model ( Figure S6). In order to investigate the crustal structure beneath the Hartford basin and its surroundings, we present the shear-wave velocities at depths of 6, 11, 18, and 25 km ( Figure 2), a west-east velocity profile along the SEISConn array (Figure 3a), the crustal thickness defined by teleseismic P wave 10.1029/2020GL089316 receiver function analysis of the SEISConn stations by Long et al (2018) (Figure 3b), and the extracted 1-D velocity profiles at three points along the SEISConn array ( Figure 3c). Receiver function analysis (Long et al, 2018; Figure 3b) revealed a relatively shallow (30 ± 5 km) Moho beneath the central Hartford basin in comparison with its western and eastern uplands (40-45 km, with particularly thick crust at the western end of the array).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At depths greater than about 30 km, the major velocity features in our velocity model are primarily inherited from the reference model ( Figure S6). In order to investigate the crustal structure beneath the Hartford basin and its surroundings, we present the shear-wave velocities at depths of 6, 11, 18, and 25 km ( Figure 2), a west-east velocity profile along the SEISConn array (Figure 3a), the crustal thickness defined by teleseismic P wave 10.1029/2020GL089316 receiver function analysis of the SEISConn stations by Long et al (2018) (Figure 3b), and the extracted 1-D velocity profiles at three points along the SEISConn array ( Figure 3c). Receiver function analysis (Long et al, 2018; Figure 3b) revealed a relatively shallow (30 ± 5 km) Moho beneath the central Hartford basin in comparison with its western and eastern uplands (40-45 km, with particularly thick crust at the western end of the array).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Shear‐wave velocity profile approximately along the SEISConn array within a depth range of 5–55 km. The dot‐connected solid line is the estimated crust‐mantle boundary (Moho) from teleseismic receiver function analysis by Long et al (2018), and each red dot represents one seismic station and corresponds to the migrated receiver function traces in (b). The dashed line shows the velocity contour at 4.0 km/s to highlight the high‐velocity crustal root.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations