2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of rock/fluid and fluid/fluid interfaces during MEOR processes, using two biosurfactant producing strains of Bacillus stearothermophilus SUCPM#14 and Enterobacter cloacae: A mechanistic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final results showed that the cells of B. stearothermophilus SUCPM#14 adhere more into the oil/water interface compared to E. cloacae and change its rheological properties. Eventually, contradicting results revealed that biosurfactant produced by E. cloacae was able to considerably reduce the interfacial tension and alter the wettability of the rock(to neutral conditions)while biosurfactant produced by B. stearothermophilus SUCPM#14 was not very effective (Sarafzadeh, 2014). …”
Section: Enterobacter Cloacaementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The final results showed that the cells of B. stearothermophilus SUCPM#14 adhere more into the oil/water interface compared to E. cloacae and change its rheological properties. Eventually, contradicting results revealed that biosurfactant produced by E. cloacae was able to considerably reduce the interfacial tension and alter the wettability of the rock(to neutral conditions)while biosurfactant produced by B. stearothermophilus SUCPM#14 was not very effective (Sarafzadeh, 2014). …”
Section: Enterobacter Cloacaementioning
confidence: 95%
“…37 A low RF value of 3.09% obtained during the MCF experiments with injected nutrients may be related to the development of a laboratory conditioning simulation module with the indigenous Geobacillus toebii R-32639 colonies; however, it was not the optimal response. 6,7,[41][42][43] The use of bioproducts (or biosurfactants) in drilling FO during MCF experiments may change the formation wettability from oil-wet to water-wet AC. The difference in RF value between these two techniques should be due to the oil recovery mechanisms involved with MCF experiments; fractured chalk blocks could be dependent on the wettability of the chalk, as the wettability has great impact on the fracture/matrix hydrocarbon exchange, 38,39 while the mechanisms of CO Fig.…”
Section: Microbial Core Ooding Experiments To Increase Crude Oil Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial-Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR), which is regarded as a tertiary method to increase oil recovery, uses different microorganisms to extract trapped oil from the reservoirs [8,9]. Several mechanisms are proposed to explain the incremental oil recovery associated with MEOR, among which are the reduction in the oil-water IFT and changes in the wettability of the system and selective plugging mechanism [10][11][12][13]. Numerous experimental and numerical studies have been conducted to understand the impact of wettability alteration and IFT reduction [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%