1990
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3812(90)85079-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of the extended uniquac model for correlating quaternary liquid—liquid equilibrium data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9,10) For the ternary mixtures having a plait point, original UNIQUAC model predicts generally larger solubility envelope than the experimental one. Good quantitative description of the ternary (liquid + liquid) equilibrium mixtures usually need ternary parameters in addition to the binary parameters.…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(9,10) For the ternary mixtures having a plait point, original UNIQUAC model predicts generally larger solubility envelope than the experimental one. Good quantitative description of the ternary (liquid + liquid) equilibrium mixtures usually need ternary parameters in addition to the binary parameters.…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(23) Values of pure component molecular size and area parameters r and q for MTBE and TAME were taken from the literature, (3) and the others were taken from Prausnitz et al (21) The values of q used in the modified UNIQUAC and extended UNIQUAC models, fixed to obtain a good representation for binary and ternary phase equilibria studied previously, were obtainable from the references. (9,10) The q used in the modified UNIQUAC model was q 0.75 for MTBE and TAME, 0.74 for water, and 0.50 for ethanol. The q used in the extended UNIQUAC model was q 0.20 for MTBE and TAME, 0.96 for water, and 0.92 for ethanol.…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pure-component molecular-size and molecular-area parameters r and q, were taken from reference 23 and q'=q 0.2 for acetonitrile, aniline, cyclohexane, and heptane, and q'=1.00 for methanol. (6,12) Table 3 gives the molar binary parameters of the extended UNIQUAC model along with the r.m.s. deviations between the experimental and most probable calculated values of the measured variables: dp for pressure; dT for temperature; dx for liquid mole fraction; and dy for vapour mole fraction.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) This paper reports results for (acetonitrile + cyclohexane + heptane), (methanol + aniline + cyclohexane + heptane), and (methanol + acetonitrile + cyclohexane + heptane), measured at the temperature T = 298.15 K. The experimental results are correlated with the two activity-coefficient models: extended UNIQUAC and modified Wilson. (12,13) Phase-equilibrium results for the binary and (14) (acetonitrile + methanol) at T = 328.15 K; (15) (cyclohexane + heptane) T = 298.15 K; (16) mutual solubilities at T = 298.15 K: (methanol + cyclohexane); (17) (methanol + heptane); (18) (aniline + cyclohexane); (19) (aniline + heptane); (19) (acetonitrile + cyclohexane); (20) and (acetonitrile + heptane); (5) and ternary tie-line results at T = 298.15 K: (methanol + aniline + heptane); (19) (methanol + aniline + cyclohexane); (19) (aniline + cyclohexane + heptane); (21) (methanol + cyclohexane + heptane); (6) (methanol + acetonitrile + cyclohexane); (17) and (methanol+acetonitrile+heptane).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%