1989
DOI: 10.4141/cjas89-128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of the Glucosamine Method for the Quantification of Fungal Contamination

Abstract: Modifications to the glucosamine (GlcN) analysis method for the quantification of fungal material in cereal grains are described. The rnodifications improve recovery of GlcN, increase reliability of the method and reduce analytical time.Key words: Glucosamine, fungal material, grain I Modification de la m6thode i la glucosamine pour la quantification de

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrogen was determined using an N analyzer (Model CNS-2000, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI). Samples for AA analysis were prepared by acid hydrolysis according to the method of AOAC (1984; method 982.30) as modified by Mills et al (Mills et al 1989). Briefly, approximately 100 mg of each sample was digested in 4 mL of 6 N HCl for 24 h at 110 °C, followed by neutralization with 4 mL of 25 % (wt/vol) NaOH and further cooled to room temperature.…”
Section: Analysis Of Conventional Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen was determined using an N analyzer (Model CNS-2000, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI). Samples for AA analysis were prepared by acid hydrolysis according to the method of AOAC (1984; method 982.30) as modified by Mills et al (Mills et al 1989). Briefly, approximately 100 mg of each sample was digested in 4 mL of 6 N HCl for 24 h at 110 °C, followed by neutralization with 4 mL of 25 % (wt/vol) NaOH and further cooled to room temperature.…”
Section: Analysis Of Conventional Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titanium dioxide content in the diet and ileal samples was measured according to the method described by Lomer et al (2000). The AA content was determined using a LKB 4151 Alpha plus AA analyzer (LKB Biochrom, Cambridge, UK) according to AOAC procedures (1990; method 944.12), and as modified by Mills et al (1989) as described by Woyengo et al (2010a). Briefly, about 100 mg of each sample was hydrolyzed with 6 N HCl, sealed, evacuated, and digested at 110 • C for 24 h. Before hydrolysis, cysteine and methionine were oxidized with formic acid.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Chemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SECM and EECM samples were analyzed for NDF according to the method of Van Soest et al (1991) using an Ankom 200 Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology, Fairport, NY) and for EE using hexane as the solvent according to the AOAC (1990; method 920.39). Samples for AA analysis were prepared by acid hydrolysis according to the method of AOAC (1990; method 982.30) and as modified by Mills et al (1989). Briefly, about 100 mg of each sample was digested in 4 mL of 6 N HCl for 24 h at 110°C, followed by neutralization with 4 mL of 25% (wt/vol) NaOH, and was cooled to room temperature.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%