1996
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0726:motpan>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of the Physics and Numerics in a Third-Generation Ocean Wave Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, numerical diffusion in wave models is sometimes discussed using terms such as "attenuation" and "dissipation" (e.g., Bender 1996). In the context of gravity waves, these terms imply a loss of energy.…”
Section: Propagation Numericsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the literature, numerical diffusion in wave models is sometimes discussed using terms such as "attenuation" and "dissipation" (e.g., Bender 1996). In the context of gravity waves, these terms imply a loss of energy.…”
Section: Propagation Numericsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The WAM model Cycle -IV use Janssen formulation intrinsically for wind-wave growth. The physical basis concerning theoretical development of the growth rate parameter (γ i n ) used in this study is explained in published work of Bender (1996). This parameter essentially controls the wind-wave growth in the governing spectral energy balance equation used in WAM model.…”
Section: Formulation For Wind-wave Growthmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Bender (1996) compared the original Cycle 3 (Snyder et al 1981;Komen et al 1984) and Cycle 4 physics to independent waverider buoy data over a one-month period (July 1992) and concluded that a wave-forecasting model for the Australian region should be based on the Cycle 3 physics. Although this led to underprediction of wave heights, it was shown that by upgrading the first-order propagation numerics to third-order and increasing the magnitude of the dissipation term by approximately 40%, a good match with the buoy observations could be achieved.…”
Section: Wave Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%