Lipoprotein Deficiency Syndromes 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-1262-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications and Degradation of High Density Lipoproteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found for adrenocortical membranes. l 1 HDL also binds to muscle cells, but there are clear differences between HDL and LDL binding in that HDL is not internalized and LDL competes as effectively as HDL for HDL binding. This was not due to lipoprotein cross-contamination, since SDS-PAGE of the LDL and HDL preparations showed that the major protein components were apoprotein BlOO and apoproteins A and E, These results imply that LDL and HDL may interact with the same recognition site with multiple potential configurations capable of recognizing a variety of lipoproteins as proposed by Angel and Fong. There is a marked change in LDL-receptor binding when muscle cells differentiate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar results were found for adrenocortical membranes. l 1 HDL also binds to muscle cells, but there are clear differences between HDL and LDL binding in that HDL is not internalized and LDL competes as effectively as HDL for HDL binding. This was not due to lipoprotein cross-contamination, since SDS-PAGE of the LDL and HDL preparations showed that the major protein components were apoprotein BlOO and apoproteins A and E, These results imply that LDL and HDL may interact with the same recognition site with multiple potential configurations capable of recognizing a variety of lipoproteins as proposed by Angel and Fong. There is a marked change in LDL-receptor binding when muscle cells differentiate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%