2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications of EEG power spectra in mesial temporal lobe during n-back tasks of increasing difficulty. A sLORETA study

Abstract: The n-back task is widely used to investigate the neural basis of Working Memory (WM) processes. The principal aim of this study was to explore and compare the EEG power spectra during two n-back tests with different levels of difficulty (1-back vs. 3-back). Fourteen healthy subjects were enrolled (seven men and seven women, mean age 31.21 ± 7.05 years, range: 23–48). EEG was recorded while performing the N-back test, by means of 19 surface electrodes referred to joint mastoids. EEG analysis were conducted by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recordings were attended by trained technicians, and the simultaneous recording of EOG and EKG further improved the artifact recognition and removal (more details of artifact rejection procedure could be found in refs 30,31). At least 120 seconds of EEG artifact-free recording (not necessarily consecutive) were analyzed for each group, in all conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recordings were attended by trained technicians, and the simultaneous recording of EOG and EKG further improved the artifact recognition and removal (more details of artifact rejection procedure could be found in refs 30,31). At least 120 seconds of EEG artifact-free recording (not necessarily consecutive) were analyzed for each group, in all conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the EEG signal, it has been used a sampling frequency of 256 Hz and impedances were kept below 5KΩ before starting the recording and further controlled at the end of each experimental session. Other details about EEG recordings (e.g., A/D conversion and preamplifiers amplitude) can be found elsewhere [58,59]. Signal processing (i.e., filtering and artifact rejection procedure) was performed using EEGlab toolbox for MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc).…”
Section: Eeg Data Acquisition and Functional Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For filtering procedure, the "basic FIR filter" option was selected, and 0.2 Hz and 100 Hz were respectively the high-frequency filter and the low-frequency filter. Artifact rejection (i.e., removal of eye movements, blinks, cardiac pulses, muscular or movement activities) was performed visually on the raw EEG (for details, see [59][60][61]). At least 3 minutes of clean EEG data (not necessarily consecutive) were selected and analyzed for each subject.…”
Section: Eeg Data Acquisition and Functional Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other details about EEG recordings (i.e., reference electrode, sampling frequencies, band-pass filters, etc.) have been described elsewhere [33,34]. In this study, the following frequency bands were considered: delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4.5-7.5 Hz), alpha (8-12.5 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz), and gamma (30.5-60 Hz).…”
Section: Eeg Recordings and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artifact rejection (e.g., eye movements, blinks, etc.) was performed visually before data analysis ( [33,34] details of artifact rejection procedure). The minimum length of the artifact-free EEG recording included in the analysis was 180 s (even if not consecutive) for each participant.…”
Section: Eeg Recordings and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%