2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications of the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist—Ways Forward to Ensure Sustainable Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the overall success of the checklist's application, indicated by its use in 94% of all surgical procedures, our study reveals gaps in compliance, particularly in emergency settings. This nding is important for re ning and targeting WHO SSC modi cations to effectively address current surgical challenges (37). Our ndings of lower use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) during emergency procedures, especially caesarean sections, emphasizes the need for increased attention to compliance with checklists during such interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the overall success of the checklist's application, indicated by its use in 94% of all surgical procedures, our study reveals gaps in compliance, particularly in emergency settings. This nding is important for re ning and targeting WHO SSC modi cations to effectively address current surgical challenges (37). Our ndings of lower use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) during emergency procedures, especially caesarean sections, emphasizes the need for increased attention to compliance with checklists during such interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be considered a success and shows a sustainable use of the checklist. However, focusing on modi cations of the WHO SSC is vital for addressing contemporary surgical issues (38), and to ensure that it is targeted and performed with quality (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%