2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications of thick-target model: re-acceleration of electron beams by static and stochastic electric fields

Abstract: Context. The collisional thick-target model (CTTM) of the impulsive phase of solar flares, together with the famous Carmichael, Sturrock, Hirayama, and Kopp-Pneuman (CSHKP) model, presented for many years a "standard" model, which straightforwardly explained many observational aspects of flares. On the other hand, many critical issues appear when the concept is scrutinised theoretically or with the new generation of hard X-ray (HXR) observations. The famous "electron number problem" or problems related to tran… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible alternative is to employ lower NT electron fluxes and explore possible re-acceleration mechanisms in the chromosphere in a similar way as done recently by (Varady et al, 2014). Including additional energy deposition mechanisms, such as NT proton energy deposition (e.g., a neutral beam simulation such as in Karlický et al, 2000) or a combination of energy deposition by other means (e.g., Fletcher and Hudson, 2008) may also be important for producing a similar atmospheric response with a smaller flux of NT electrons.…”
Section: Future Modeling Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible alternative is to employ lower NT electron fluxes and explore possible re-acceleration mechanisms in the chromosphere in a similar way as done recently by (Varady et al, 2014). Including additional energy deposition mechanisms, such as NT proton energy deposition (e.g., a neutral beam simulation such as in Karlický et al, 2000) or a combination of energy deposition by other means (e.g., Fletcher and Hudson, 2008) may also be important for producing a similar atmospheric response with a smaller flux of NT electrons.…”
Section: Future Modeling Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport, scattering and progressive thermalization of the beam electrons 234 P. Heinzel et al due to Coulomb collisions with particles of ambient plasma in the magnetized flaring atmosphere and the resulting flare heating corresponding to the local energy losses of beam electrons is calculated using an approach proposed by Bai (1982) and Karlický & Hénoux (1992) based on test particles and Monte Carlo method. This approach, fully equivalent to direct solution of the corresponding Fokker-Planck equation (MacKinnon & Craig 1991), provides a flexible way to model many various aspects of the beam electron interactions with the ambient plasma, converging magnetic field in the flare loop or with additional electric fields (Varady et al 2014). These were proposed in various modifications of the standard CSHKP flare model (e.g.…”
Section: Rhd Code Flarixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future observations with high cadence echelle flare spectra around the Balmer jump and Hα can provide critical constraints for the formation of such dense CC's in M dwarf flares. If high density CC's are formed in M dwarf flares, then we may need to consider a physical mechanism, such neutral beams (Karlický et al 2000), re-acceleration processes (Varady et al 2014), or in-situ chromospheric acceleration (Fletcher & Hudson 2008), to allow F13 beams to penetrate into the lower atmosphere.…”
Section: Future Modeling Workmentioning
confidence: 99%