2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified 3D printed powder to cement-based material and mechanical properties of cement scaffold used in 3D printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The printed part under the uniaxial compression load could be broke in various directions according to the direction of printing. Figure 6b, in the same saturation specimens such as (S100 C100), a shell part under a uniaxial compression load detached their parts from the core part of the specimens (Shakor et al, 2017b). Further, investigations are required to determine the reasons behind the observed results, Figure 6.…”
Section: Saturation Level = V Binder V Envpowdermentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The printed part under the uniaxial compression load could be broke in various directions according to the direction of printing. Figure 6b, in the same saturation specimens such as (S100 C100), a shell part under a uniaxial compression load detached their parts from the core part of the specimens (Shakor et al, 2017b). Further, investigations are required to determine the reasons behind the observed results, Figure 6.…”
Section: Saturation Level = V Binder V Envpowdermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The extrudability and buildability of the printer have been changed according to the mix design variations. Pegna, 1997;Le, 1998;Lee et al, 2007;Gibbons et al, 2010;Rael and San Fratello, 2011;Henke and Treml, 2012;Brown, 2015;Perrot et al, 2015;Shakor et al, 2017b;Dikshit et al, 2018 Selective Zein et al, 2002;Shofner et al, 2003;Lewis et al, 2006;Mueller et al, 2014;Hager et al, 2016;Jianchao et al, 2017;Nerella et al, 2017 Gosselin et al (2016) investigated the 3DP mix proportions of concrete (see Table 3). The materials consist of an ultrahigh performance mortar paste, with an added polymer resin to improve the quality interfaces between layers and accelerating agents in order to attain adequate rheology.…”
Section: Concrete MIX Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accelerator was used in dosages of 1L, 2L and 3L for 50 kg of cement, respectively, which for water/binder ratio W/B=0.5 corresponds to 4%, 8% and 12% of water volume. The consumption of materials per 1m 3 of concrete mixture is given in table 1. The samples were hardened in a chamber of normal hardening at a temperature of 20±1 °С and an air humidity not less than 90%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are two approaches toward enhancement of the mechanical response of additively manufactured materials: a) elimination of detrimental heterogeneities such as porosities and interfaces present in fabricated metallic, ceramic, and hydrogel materials via optimizing the printing parameters in order to achieve performance comparable to cast counterparts and; b) incorporation of multiscale, hierarchical, and bioinspired design principles over a broad range of architectures of fabricated materials, from nano to micro, in order to engineer the mechanical properties, to significantly enhance the strength and tensile performance, load‐bearing capacity, compliancy, and impact resistance, and to overcome the brittleness and flaw‐sensitivity limitations of these materials . Similar to the trends observed in other additively manufactured materials, the presence of weak interface is considered detrimental for the overall mechanical performance of additively manufactured cement‐based materials, and current research efforts focus mostly on eliminating or strengthening the AM‐induced interfaces as a mean to minimize their effect on the overall strength, bearing capacity and to improve stress transfer across the interfaces in 3D‐printed elements . Contrary to the common approach that suggests elimination of the processing‐induced interfaces in various materials, we present a novel approach that combines harnessing the properties of heterogeneous interfaces with the design of material's architecture that can promote favorable damage mechanisms, allows for achievement of flaw tolerance and unique load–displacement response, and enhances the mechanical response in brittle cement‐based materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%