2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Arrhenius constitutive model and simulation verification of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy during hot compression

Yingxiang Xia,
Xuedao Shu,
Qingdong Zhang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains a decrease of elongation with increasing temperature during hot deformation. A hyperbolic Arrhenius constitutive model [76][77][78] is successfully constructed to estimate the flow stress behavior of this alloy in the studied temperature and strain rate range. The developed model demonstrated high predictability accuracy with the maximum error AARE of 6.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains a decrease of elongation with increasing temperature during hot deformation. A hyperbolic Arrhenius constitutive model [76][77][78] is successfully constructed to estimate the flow stress behavior of this alloy in the studied temperature and strain rate range. The developed model demonstrated high predictability accuracy with the maximum error AARE of 6.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al 15 used a neural network developed by a genetic algorithm to accurately predict the hot deformation behavior of AA5005 aluminum alloy. While high-accuracy forecasting of neural networks is ensured, it is often considered that the mechanisms of material deformation are ignored 16 . The linear fitting and average slope used by the Arrhenius model to calculate material parameters are the reasons why the Arrhenius model cannot be predicted with extreme precision 15 , 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ensured, it is often considered that the mechanisms of material deformation are ignored 16 . The linear fitting and average slope used by the Arrhenius model to calculate material parameters are the reasons why the Arrhenius model cannot be predicted with extreme precision 15,17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the determination of a rational constitutive relationship to describe flow stress is challenging due to the multitude of factors influencing it [14]. The most extensively employed is the Arrhenius constitutive mode [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%