2001
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-001-0191-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified California Roller for Measuring Transferable Residues on Treated Turfgrass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dermal exposure + hand to mouth transfer + object to mouth transfer Children's hand to mouth transfer should be calculated using the following equation:  TTR = turf transferable residues (%) (for products applied in liquid sprays, 5 % is used, and, for products applied as granules, 1 % is used (these values come from data obtained using the Modified Californian Roller Method (Fuller et al, 2001;Rosenheck et al, 2001), and represent the upper end of the range from a number of studies with different compounds)  SE = saliva extraction factor (%) (a default value of 50 % is recommended by US EPA, 2001; it refers to the fraction of pesticide extracted from a hand/object via saliva. It is a median value from a study by Camann and colleagues on the fraction of pesticide extracted by saliva from hands (Camann et al, 1995))  SA = surface area of hands (cm 2 ) (the assumption used here is that 20 cm 2 of skin area is contacted each time a child puts a hand in his or her mouth (US EPA, 2001))  Freq = frequency of hand to mouth (events per hour) (for short-term exposures, a value of 9.5 events per hour is recommended; this is the average of observations ranging from 0 to 70 events per hour ( Values for drift percentage should be taken from Table 18, as appropriate.…”
Section:  H = Exposure Duration (Hours) (A Default Value Of Two Hourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Dermal exposure + hand to mouth transfer + object to mouth transfer Children's hand to mouth transfer should be calculated using the following equation:  TTR = turf transferable residues (%) (for products applied in liquid sprays, 5 % is used, and, for products applied as granules, 1 % is used (these values come from data obtained using the Modified Californian Roller Method (Fuller et al, 2001;Rosenheck et al, 2001), and represent the upper end of the range from a number of studies with different compounds)  SE = saliva extraction factor (%) (a default value of 50 % is recommended by US EPA, 2001; it refers to the fraction of pesticide extracted from a hand/object via saliva. It is a median value from a study by Camann and colleagues on the fraction of pesticide extracted by saliva from hands (Camann et al, 1995))  SA = surface area of hands (cm 2 ) (the assumption used here is that 20 cm 2 of skin area is contacted each time a child puts a hand in his or her mouth (US EPA, 2001))  Freq = frequency of hand to mouth (events per hour) (for short-term exposures, a value of 9.5 events per hour is recommended; this is the average of observations ranging from 0 to 70 events per hour ( Values for drift percentage should be taken from Table 18, as appropriate.…”
Section:  H = Exposure Duration (Hours) (A Default Value Of Two Hourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values come from data obtained using the Modified Californian Roller Method (Fuller et al, 2001;Rosenheck et al, 2001), and represent the upper end of the range from a number of studies with different compounds  SE = saliva extraction factor (%) (a default value of 50 % is recommended by US EPA, 2001; it refers to the fraction of pesticide extracted from a hand/object via saliva. These values come from data obtained using the Modified Californian Roller Method (Fuller et al, 2001;Rosenheck et al, 2001), and represent the upper end of the range from a number of studies with different compounds  SE = saliva extraction factor (%) (a default value of 50 % is recommended by US EPA, 2001; it refers to the fraction of pesticide extracted from a hand/object via saliva.…”
Section: Surface Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[2] Thus, understanding the determinants of transfer from pesticide-treated surfaces to the skin is critical in estimating residential exposure. Historically, dislodgeable residues have been used as indicators of potential exposure to residents, and many different methods to measure transferability have been evaluated [vacuum sampler, [3] hand press, [4] polyurethane foam (PUF) roller, [5] California roller [6] modified California roller [7] Lioy, Wainman, Weisel (LWW) sampler [8] drag sled [9] solvent wipes [10] etc.] Implementation of the new US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) regulations on "intentional" dosing studies that may be used for regulating pesticides has virtually eliminated support for new human exposure monitoring studies with any chemical including non-pesticides, but not obviated the need for them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%