2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(02)00843-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified chemical deposition and physico-chemical properties of copper sulphide (Cu2S) thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
71
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sheet resistance of Cu x S thin film was found to be 10 −2 Ω cm by d.c. 2-point probe method at room temperature, which is agreement with the values reported previously [18,19]. Since the film was of low electrical resistance, sheet resistance was also directly measured using a digital multimeter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sheet resistance of Cu x S thin film was found to be 10 −2 Ω cm by d.c. 2-point probe method at room temperature, which is agreement with the values reported previously [18,19]. Since the film was of low electrical resistance, sheet resistance was also directly measured using a digital multimeter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Generally, the resistivity of Cu x S films varies depending on the stoichiometry and fabrication method and p-type conductivity is attributed to free holes from acceptor levels of copper vacancies [11]. Cu x S thin films have been prepared by several techniques such as atomic layer deposition [7], vacuum evaporation [12], RF reactive sputtering [13], chemical bath deposition [3,14], spray pyrolysis [15,16], and successive ionic layer * Correspondence: a astam@yahoo.com adsorption and reaction (SILAR) [17][18][19][20]. The stoichiometry of Cu x S films often depends on the fabrication method used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At x = 0.09, the absorption is still quite low. But as we ramp the Cu content (x > 0.35), absorption from Cu y S phases, which have smaller band gaps (0.6 -2.35 eV, depending on crystal structure), [52] begins to dominate and significantly decrease transmittance. Additionally, band tailing might be present at low Cu concentrations.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• C. It is reported that Cu x S, Sn x S, and Zn x S have direct bandgap of 2.35 eV, 29 2.0 eV, 30 and 2.99 to 3.80 eV, 31 respectively, all of which are larger than that of CZTS. The insert in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%