2022
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s382916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Technique to Rescue Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty

Abstract: Purpose To describe a modified deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) technique to rescue failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) grafts and report its results. Patients and Methods Retrospective, case-series analysis of patients who underwent modified DALK to rescue failed corneal grafts after PK was included. Every patient had corneal graft failure (GF) diagnosis due to anterior corneal (epithelium, Bowman’s, and stroma layers) or refraction disorders uncorrectable w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeat keratoplasty in the management of high astigmatism after keratoplasty has been previously described, although largely in eyes that have previously undergone PK rather than DALK. DALK after PK [24][25][26][27] was initially described by Lake et al in keratoconic patients with host rim thinning and ectasia after PK. A wide diameter trephination was used (range 9.25-10.5 mm) to include the peripheral residual ectasia, with subsequent manual dissection of the deep stroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeat keratoplasty in the management of high astigmatism after keratoplasty has been previously described, although largely in eyes that have previously undergone PK rather than DALK. DALK after PK [24][25][26][27] was initially described by Lake et al in keratoconic patients with host rim thinning and ectasia after PK. A wide diameter trephination was used (range 9.25-10.5 mm) to include the peripheral residual ectasia, with subsequent manual dissection of the deep stroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%