2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified distal tibial oblique osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle: Operative procedure and preliminary results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DTOO is a corrective osteotomy for ankle osteoarthritis designed to stabilize the tibiotalar joint, increase CA, and redistribute joint CP to relieve pain and improve ankle function [4][5][6]. Although clinical studies have shown promising results [6][7][8], biomechanical evidence supporting the efficacy of DTOO is lacking. Using patient-specific FE models, the current study demonstrated for the first time that DTOO effectively improved the biomechanics of ankle osteoarthritis, as indicated by increased CA and redistribution of CP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DTOO is a corrective osteotomy for ankle osteoarthritis designed to stabilize the tibiotalar joint, increase CA, and redistribute joint CP to relieve pain and improve ankle function [4][5][6]. Although clinical studies have shown promising results [6][7][8], biomechanical evidence supporting the efficacy of DTOO is lacking. Using patient-specific FE models, the current study demonstrated for the first time that DTOO effectively improved the biomechanics of ankle osteoarthritis, as indicated by increased CA and redistribution of CP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distal tibial oblique osteotomy (DTOO) serves as a corrective osteotomy for varus osteoarthritis with the goal of stabilizing the tibiotalar joint, increasing the contact area (CA), and redistributing joint contact pressure (CP) to relieve pain and improve ankle function [4][5][6]. Despite encouraging clinical results [6][7][8], no study has validated the biomechanical improvements in the ankle after DTOO. Furthermore, there exists a lack of concrete evidence to direct the surgical indications for DTOO or to establish an association between morphological correction and treatment efficacy, leaving the decision largely at the discretion of the surgeon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classied the 33 patient cohorts according to the obtained MDTA described at ollow-up as shown in Table 2; 7 cohorts [13,22,[24][25][26][27]38] categorized in valgus overcorrection (mean correction o 11 degrees), 9 cohorts [12,14,23,24,28,[32][33][34]36] in valgus correction (mean correction o 9 degrees), 10 cohorts [11,16,[29][30][31]35,[39][40][41]45] in neutral correction (mean correction o 8 degrees), 6 cohorts (4 studies) [4,37,42,43] in varus correction (mean correction o 8 degrees), and 1 cohort [44] in varus overcorrection (mean correction o 4 degrees). At baseline the 5 categories had a mean ankle OA stage o 3 and a comparable mean preoperative MDTA o 82-85 degrees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our included studies [12,16,34,39] patient characteristics and outcomes were described individually. For analysis o the relationship between the obtained correction and clinical outcome a total o 34 patients were identied (Table 3).…”
Section: Individual Patient Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watanabe et al found that a potential concern with tibial open-wedge osteotomies, especially DTOO, is soft tissue or skin complications due to excessive tension following the displacement of the osteotomized distal tibial fragment, including severe problems such as infection and bone nonunion. 9 The correction angle may be insufficient to avoid skin and subcutaneous problems. Teramoto et al have noted that if there is no previous scarring of the medial skin, and the osteotomy separation is less than 15 mm, a locking plate can be inserted without removing the medial tibial cortex and cancellous bone.…”
Section: Brief Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%