2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Frailty Index Can Be Used to Predict Adverse Outcomes and Mortality after Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Seven multi-domain tools were adopted in 12 studies to assess frailty status before vascular procedures: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), 8 Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), 31 modified Frailty Index (mFI), 13,14,26,29,30 Barthel Index (BI), 15 Addenbrooke's Vascular Frailty Score (AVFS), 28 Ruptured Aneurysm Frailty Score (RAFS), 27…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Seven multi-domain tools were adopted in 12 studies to assess frailty status before vascular procedures: the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), 8 Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), 31 modified Frailty Index (mFI), 13,14,26,29,30 Barthel Index (BI), 15 Addenbrooke's Vascular Frailty Score (AVFS), 28 Ruptured Aneurysm Frailty Score (RAFS), 27…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Six studies were conducted in patients who underwent major vascular surgery, 7,8,28,30,31,34 nine studies in patients with AAA, 11,12,14,27,33,36e39 and 10 studies in patients with LEAD. 10,13,15,25,26,29,32,33,35,40 The basic characteristics of the included studies are given in Table 1.…”
Section: And Criticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our sensitivity analysis, evaluating the relationship between frailty and absolute length of hospitalization without accounting for type of surgery, also revealed a prediction error greater than 2 days for both indices. Many investigators report significant associations between measures of frailty and postoperative complications, 1,5,6,8,16,19,20,29,[36][37][38][39][40] but only some report C statistics, 6,29,30,33,36,37,39 which quantify clinical importance. Reported C statistics range from 0.53 to 0.68, with most being between 0.60 and 0.65, 6,29,30,39 which are similar to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Both the Modified Frailty Index and the Hopkins Frailty Score predict adverse outcomes after surgery. 1,5,[18][19][20][21][22] It is unclear, however, which paradigm of frailty assessment better assesses perioperative risk. Because there is no gold standard to validate these frailty assessment tools, comparison of their abilities to predict adverse postoperative outcomes would be most useful.…”
Section: What This Article Tells Us That Is Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation