2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-009-9337-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified generalized Hadamard matrices and constructions for transversal designs

Abstract: It is well known that there exists a transversal design TD λ [k; u] admitting a class regular automorphism group U if and only if there exists a generalized Hadamard matrix GH(u, λ) over U . Note that in this case the resulting transversal design is symmetric by Jungnickel's result. In this article we define a modified generalized Hadamard matrix and show that transversal designs which are not necessarily symmetric can be constructed from these under a modified condition similar to class regularity even if it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [6] we introduced the notion of a modified generalized Hadamard matrix over a group. We first give a summary of the related results, which we will use in the later sections.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [6] we introduced the notion of a modified generalized Hadamard matrix over a group. We first give a summary of the related results, which we will use in the later sections.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transversal designs obtained from G H(s, u, λ) matrices are not always symmetric (see Example 5.3 of [6]) and do not always admit class regular automorphism groups even if they are symmetric (see [7]). The following gives a criterion for the resulting transversal design to be symmetric.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From each spread we obtain many GH(q, q, q) matrices [2] and we say that the resulting transversal designs are of spread type. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Result 1.1[2] Let [D i j ] be a t ×tGH(s, u, λ) matrix over a group H of order su with respect to subgroups U i (1 ≤ i ≤ t), where t = uλ/s. If we define P and B by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%